Skip to main content
United StatesEnglish LanguageSyllabus dot point

How do dashes and parentheses set off extra information on the ACT, and why must a dash or parenthesis match its partner?

Dashes and parentheses on ACT English: using a pair of dashes or parentheses (or a pair of commas) to set off a nonessential element, the matching-pair rule that you cannot open with a dash and close with a comma, and using a single dash to introduce an explanation or list after a complete clause.

A focused answer to dashes and parentheses on ACT English: setting off nonessential information with a matching pair of dashes, parentheses, or commas, the rule that the opening and closing marks must match, and using a single dash like a colon to introduce an explanation or list after a complete clause.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this skill is asking
  2. Pairs set off nonessential information
  3. The single dash as an introducer
  4. Choosing the right mark on an underlined portion
  5. Why matching is the whole game
  6. Try this

What this skill is asking

Dashes and parentheses both set off extra information, and the ACT tests two things about them: that a pair of them (or a pair of commas) brackets a nonessential element, and that the opening and closing marks match. The favorite trap is mismatched marks, opening with a dash and closing with a comma, which is always wrong. A single dash also has a second use, introducing an explanation after a complete clause, much like a colon.

Pairs set off nonessential information

The core idea is the same as the nonessential comma: a removable element gets brackets on both sides, and the brackets must be the same kind.

The reason this matters: when an underlined portion includes only the closing mark, the correct option is the one whose mark matches the opening mark already in the sentence. So read backward to find what opened the element, then close it with the same kind of mark.

The single dash as an introducer

A lone dash near the end of a sentence usually is not a bracketing dash; it is doing the colon's introducing job.

So a dash can appear singly (introducing) or in a pair (bracketing). The way to tell: if the dash sits between two parts and the second part runs to the end of the sentence as an explanation, it is a single introducing dash; if extra information sits between two marks in the middle of the sentence, you need a matching pair.

Choosing the right mark on an underlined portion

When an underlined portion is the closing mark of a set-off element, match it to the opening mark.

Why matching is the whole game

Dash and parenthesis questions are usually decided by one check: does the closing mark match the opening mark? The marks are interchangeable as long as they are used in matching pairs, so the ACT rarely asks you to prefer a dash over a comma on style alone; it asks you to keep the pair consistent. The single-dash introducer is the one extra case, and it follows the colon's complete-clause rule. This topic is really the nonessential-comma rule extended to two more mark types, plus a colon-like use, so it reuses logic you already have.

Try this

Q1. What are the three ways to set off a nonessential element in the middle of a sentence, and what is the matching-pair rule? [Recall]

  • Cue. A pair of commas, a pair of dashes, or a pair of parentheses. The matching-pair rule says the opening and closing marks must be the same kind: you cannot open with a dash and close with a comma, or open with a parenthesis and close with a dash.

Q2. A sentence reads "The professor (a Nobel laureate, retired last year." What is wrong, and how do you fix it? [Short explanation]

  • Cue. The element "a Nobel laureate" opens with a parenthesis but never closes with one (it closes with a comma instead), so the pair does not match. Fix it by closing with a parenthesis: "The professor (a Nobel laureate) retired last year." The opening and closing marks now match.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of ACT exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

ACT English (style)1 marksChoose the best option: 'The first car she ever owned, a rusty hatchback - was surprisingly reliable.' (A) NO CHANGE (B) hatchback, was (C) hatchback) was (D) hatchback; was
Show worked answer →

The correct answer is (B), "hatchback, was". The phrase "a rusty hatchback" is a nonessential element set off from the sentence, and it opened with a comma after "owned", so it must close with a comma too. The matching mark for the opening comma is a closing comma.

Why not the others: (A) opens with a comma but closes with a dash, which do not match; (C) closes with a parenthesis with no opening one; (D) a semicolon would need an independent clause after it, but "was surprisingly reliable" is not independent. The pair must match: comma to comma.

ACT English (style)1 marksChoose the best option: 'He finally found what he had been searching for all summer, the perfect campsite.' (A) NO CHANGE (B) for all summer - the perfect campsite (C) for, all summer the perfect campsite (D) for all summer the perfect campsite
Show worked answer →

The correct answer is (B), "for all summer - the perfect campsite". The first part is a complete independent clause, and "the perfect campsite" is an explanation or emphatic addition at the end. A single dash can introduce that explanation, working much like a colon.

Why not the others: (A) uses a comma, which is too weak to set off this emphatic ending cleanly and risks a splice feel; (C) adds a stray comma and drops the needed mark; (D) gives no punctuation before the addition. A single dash after a complete clause correctly introduces the explanatory phrase.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this