Conflicting Viewpoints: claims, agreement, evidence and pacing quiz quiz
12questions. Pick an answer and you'll see why right away.
A Conflicting Viewpoints passage presents two or more:
Compared with a Data Representation passage, Conflicting Viewpoints is generally:
As you read each viewpoint, you should capture its central claim:
In an argument, a fact cited to back up the main position is best described as:
Two scientists give different causes for the same observed pattern. They are most likely to agree on:
Using the accept-or-reject test, a statement that one view accepts and the other rejects is:
Scientist 1 claims a comet impact caused an extinction. The discovery of a large crater of exactly the right age would most likely:
Scientist 2 claims prolonged volcanic eruptions caused an extinction. A finding of no large-scale volcanic activity at that time would most likely:
A new finding that bears on neither view's claim is best described as:
Because Conflicting Viewpoints reads slowly, a sound time strategy is to:
Within a Conflicting Viewpoints passage, the most efficient order is usually to answer:
To answer a detail question about what a specific scientist claims, you should: