Skip to main content
United StatesCalculusSyllabus dot point

How does the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus let you evaluate a definite integral using an antiderivative?

Topic 6.7 The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Definite Integrals: evaluate definite integrals using the second part of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

A focused answer to AP Calculus AB Topic 6.7, evaluating definite integrals with the second part of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus by finding an antiderivative and computing the difference at the limits, with worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The evaluation theorem
  3. A worked evaluation
  4. The net change theorem
  5. Why the two parts of the FTC fit together
  6. Combining the FTC with given function values
  7. Substitution with definite integrals

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 6.7) gives the second part of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC), the evaluation tool: to compute abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x)\,dx, find any antiderivative FF of ff and evaluate F(b)F(a)F(b) - F(a). This replaces the limit-of-Riemann-sums definition with a quick computation.

The evaluation theorem

The constant of integration is irrelevant here: if FF and F+CF + C are both antiderivatives, then (F(b)+C)(F(a)+C)=F(b)F(a)(F(b) + C) - (F(a) + C) = F(b) - F(a), so the CC cancels. For definite integrals you simply pick the cleanest antiderivative.

A worked evaluation

The net change theorem

A direct corollary of the FTC is the net change theorem: if F=fF' = f is a rate of change, then abf(x)dx=F(b)F(a)\int_a^b f(x)\,dx = F(b) - F(a) is the net change in FF over [a,b][a, b]. So the integral of a velocity is the net displacement; the integral of a flow rate is the net amount accumulated. This connects the evaluation rule back to the Unit 6.1 accumulation idea: the area under a rate graph (now computed exactly via an antiderivative) is the net change in the quantity. The exam exploits this by giving a rate ff and asking for the net change, which you compute as F(b)F(a)F(b) - F(a).

Why the two parts of the FTC fit together

Part 1 says differentiating an accumulation function recovers the integrand; Part 2 says a definite integral can be evaluated through any antiderivative. They are two faces of the same inverse relationship between differentiation and integration. Part 1 guarantees that antiderivatives exist (the accumulation function is one), and Part 2 lets you use whichever antiderivative is easiest. On the no-calculator section, evaluating definite integrals by Part 2 is among the most frequent tasks, so fluency with basic antiderivatives (the next topic) is what makes this fast. Always present the antiderivative in brackets with the limits, then the subtraction, so the grader can follow the work.

Combining the FTC with given function values

A frequent free-response pattern gives f(a)f(a) and a rate ff', then asks for f(b)f(b). By the net change theorem, f(b)=f(a)+abf(x)dxf(b) = f(a) + \int_a^b f'(x)\,dx: the new value is the old value plus the accumulated change. You evaluate the integral (by an antiderivative, or numerically on the calculator part) and add it to the known starting value. This structure appears for position from velocity, amount from a flow rate, and temperature from a heating rate. The recurring error is reporting the integral alone, which is only the change, and forgetting to add the initial value f(a)f(a). Writing the starting-value-plus-integral form explicitly keeps the two pieces straight.

Substitution with definite integrals

When the antiderivative requires a uu-substitution, you have two clean options on a definite integral: change the limits to uu-values and evaluate entirely in uu, or find the antiderivative in xx and use the original xx-limits. Both are valid; the limit-changing route avoids back-substitution and is usually faster. The pairing with the FTC is seamless, since once you have any antiderivative, Part 2 evaluates the definite integral as upper-minus-lower. Keeping the limits matched to the variable you evaluate in, uu-limits with a uu-antiderivative, xx-limits with an xx-antiderivative, prevents the classic mismatch error.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2022 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice, no calculator). 132xdx=\int_1^3 2x\,dx = (A) 44 (B) 66 (C) 88 (D) 99
Show worked answer →

The correct answer is (C), 88.

An antiderivative of 2x2x is x2x^2. By the FTC, 132xdx=[x2]13=91=8\int_1^3 2x\,dx = [x^2]_1^3 = 9 - 1 = 8.

AP 2024 (style)3 marksSection II (free response, no calculator). A particle moves with velocity v(t)=3t24tv(t) = 3t^2 - 4t m/s. (a) Evaluate 02v(t)dt\int_0^2 v(t)\,dt. (b) Interpret the result in context.
Show worked answer →

A 3-point evaluation-and-interpretation question.

(a) (2 points) An antiderivative is t32t2t^3 - 2t^2. So 02vdt=[t32t2]02=(88)0=0\int_0^2 v\,dt = [t^3 - 2t^2]_0^2 = (8 - 8) - 0 = 0.
(b) (1 point) The net displacement of the particle over 0t20 \le t \le 2 is 00 meters; it returns to its starting position (net, not total, distance).

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this