How do arguments and perspectives relate to one another, and how do you read texts in conversation?
Topic 3.7 How Arguments Relate: explain how multiple arguments and perspectives on an issue relate - agreeing, qualifying, or opposing one another - and read texts in conversation.
A focused answer to AP English Language Topic 3.7, covering how arguments on an issue relate to one another (agreement, qualification, tension, opposition), how to read multiple texts in conversation, the difference between a topic and a position, and how this skill underpins the synthesis essay.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this topic is asking
Topic 3.7 (skill REO-1.A) asks you to explain how arguments relate: not just what each writer says, but how their positions sit against one another, agreeing, qualifying, complicating, or opposing. Real issues are conversations, not duels. Reading texts in conversation is the foundation of the synthesis essay and a recurring multiple choice skill, and it depends on separating the shared topic from each writer's distinct position.
How arguments relate
The crude binary, "do they agree or disagree?", misses most of the relationship. The richest relationships are partial: two writers who share a premise but draw different conclusions, or who are both right about different parts of a problem. The exam rewards reading these gradations.
A spectrum of relationships
- Agreement. Two arguments support the same position, perhaps from different angles or evidence.
- Qualified agreement. They share ground but one adds a condition, cost, or limit ("yes, but only if").
- Complication. Both can be true at once and sit in tension, revealing the issue's complexity.
- Opposition. They reach incompatible conclusions on the same question.
Topic versus position
The enabling skill is separating the topic (the issue every source addresses) from each writer's position (their specific claim about it). Two writers on the same topic may take opposite positions; two on different-sounding topics may share a position. Pin down each writer's position first, then you can map the relationships accurately.
Why this matters for the exam
This skill is the engine of the synthesis essay (Free Response Question 1), which is explicitly graded on putting sources in conversation. It also appears on the multiple choice section in paired-passage sets that ask how two arguments relate. The sophistication point rewards writers who hold genuine tension between sources and let the conversation refine their own view, the exact move this topic teaches.
Try this
Q1. Name three ways two arguments on an issue can relate beyond simple agreement. [Recall]
- Cue. Qualified agreement (sharing a premise but adding a condition or cost), complication (both true at once and in tension), and opposition (incompatible conclusions on the same question).
Q2. Source A argues that free public transport increases access; Source B agrees access matters but warns of the cost to city budgets. How do these arguments relate, and how could you use the relationship in a synthesis essay? [Short explanation]
- Cue. They relate as qualified agreement: B shares A's value (access) but adds a constraint (cost). In a synthesis essay you could use the tension to sharpen your own position, arguing for free transport while engaging B's cost concern and showing how access can be funded, so the conversation strengthens rather than weakens your claim.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
AP 2024 (multiple choice, style)1 marksTwo passages discuss remote work. The first argues it frees workers; the second agrees workers gain flexibility but warns it isolates them. The relationship between the two arguments is best described as (A) direct contradiction (B) agreement with a qualification (C) identical positions (D) an unrelated pairing (E) one citing the other.Show worked answer →
Answer: (B). The skill is reading how two arguments relate rather than forcing them into agree-or-disagree.
The second passage shares the first's premise (remote work gives flexibility) but qualifies the overall view by adding a cost (isolation). That is agreement with a qualification, not flat contradiction.
Why not the others: (A) they are not opposites, since they share ground; (C) the second adds a warning the first lacks; (D) both address the same issue; (E) neither cites the other.
Markers reward students who see the nuanced relationship, agreement with tension, that the synthesis essay demands.
AP 2023 (synthesis, style)6 marksThe following sources present differing perspectives on whether cities should make public transport free. Read them carefully. Then write an essay that develops your position by putting the sources in conversation, showing how their arguments relate to one another and to your own.Show worked answer →
Free Response Question 1 (synthesis), 6-point rubric (1 thesis, 4 evidence and commentary, 1 sophistication).
This is the heart of synthesis: not summarizing sources one by one, but showing how they relate.
Thesis (1 point): take a defensible position, e.g. "Cities should make transport free, because the access it buys outweighs the costs that critics, rightly, insist we plan for."
Evidence and commentary (4 points): put sources in conversation, where one qualifies another, where two agree from different angles, and weave them into a single line of reasoning.
Sophistication (1 point): hold genuine tension between sources rather than stacking those that agree, and show how the conversation sharpens your own position.
The essay rewards reading arguments as a conversation, the exact skill of this topic.
Related dot points
- Topic 3.1 Interpreting Perspective: identify a writer's perspective and bias and explain how that perspective shapes the selection, framing, and emphasis of an argument.
A focused answer to AP English Language Topic 3.1, covering what a writer's perspective and bias are, how perspective shapes the selection and framing of evidence, how to distinguish perspective from purpose, and how to read perspective accurately in a passage for the rhetorical analysis essay.
- Topic 3.3 Introducing and Integrating Evidence: introduce and integrate sources and evidence into an argument so that quotations and data are framed, attributed, and connected to the claim.
A focused answer to AP English Language Topic 3.3, covering how to introduce, frame, and integrate quotations and data into an argument, the difference between dropped and integrated evidence, signal phrases, and how integration connects evidence to the claim through commentary.
- Topic 3.5 Attributing and Citing Sources: attribute and cite the sources of evidence so that an argument is credible, traceable, and free of plagiarism.
A focused answer to AP English Language Topic 3.5, covering why writers attribute sources, the difference between attribution and formal citation, how attribution builds credibility and reveals a source's perspective, the AP synthesis convention of citing by source label, and how to avoid plagiarism.
- Topic 3.6 Narration and Cause-Effect: develop parts of an argument using narration and cause-and-effect, and explain how these methods of development advance a purpose.
A focused answer to AP English Language Topic 3.6, covering how the methods of development narration and cause-and-effect build parts of an argument, how each serves a purpose, how to recognize them in a passage, and how to deploy them in your own writing without slipping into mere storytelling.
- Topic 2.2 Qualifying and Developing Claims: qualify a claim and acknowledge counterclaims to make a position more reasonable and credible.
A focused answer to AP English Language Topic 2.2, covering how qualifiers limit the scope of a claim, how acknowledging counterclaims builds credibility, the difference between conceding and refuting, and how to keep a claim defensible.
Sources & how we know this
- AP English Language and Composition Course and Exam Description — College Board (2020)