Skip to main content
United StatesPhysicsSyllabus dot point

What does it mean for an object to be in rotational equilibrium, and how is Newton's first law extended to rotation?

Topic 5.5 Rotational Equilibrium and Newton's First Law in Rotational Form: apply the condition of zero net torque for rotational equilibrium, alongside zero net force, to analyze balanced rigid bodies.

A focused answer to AP Physics 1 Topic 5.5, covering rotational equilibrium, the condition of zero net torque, the rotational form of Newton's first law, the two equilibrium conditions for a rigid body, and solving balanced-beam and ladder problems, with full worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The two conditions for equilibrium
  3. Newton's first law in rotational form
  4. Solving equilibrium problems
  5. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 5.5) wants you to apply rotational equilibrium: a rigid body is in equilibrium only when the net torque is zero as well as the net force. This extends Newton's first law to rotation: with zero net torque, an object's rotational state (at rest or spinning steadily) does not change. You use the two conditions together to analyze balanced beams, signs and ladders.

The two conditions for equilibrium

A point particle needs only F=0\sum F = 0 to be in equilibrium, but an extended rigid body needs τ=0\sum \tau = 0 as well, because a balanced set of forces can still produce a net turning effect. A seesaw with equal forces at unequal distances has zero net force but a net torque, so it rotates.

Newton's first law in rotational form

This mirrors the translational first law (Topic 2.3): no net force means no change in velocity; no net torque means no change in angular velocity. The two laws together describe what "balanced" means for an extended body.

Solving equilibrium problems

The practical method is to choose the axis cleverly. Because τ=0\sum \tau = 0 holds about any axis for a body in equilibrium, you pick the axis to pass through an unknown force you want to eliminate (a force through the axis has zero lever arm and so contributes no torque). This often turns a problem with two unknown support forces into a single torque equation with one unknown, which you solve directly; then F=0\sum F = 0 gives the remaining force. The routine is: draw a free-body diagram showing every force and where it acts, treat the object's weight as acting at its center of mass, choose an axis, write the torque equation (τ=0\sum \tau = 0, balancing clockwise against counterclockwise), and write the force equation (F=0\sum F = 0). This is the rotational counterpart of the equilibrium analysis from Unit 2, now requiring the extra torque condition because the body is extended rather than a point. Balanced beams, diving boards, hanging signs supported by a cable, and ladders leaning against walls are all the same problem: identify the forces and their lever arms, set the net torque to zero about a smart axis, and solve. Choosing the axis to kill an unknown is the single most useful trick, and it is heavily rewarded on the exam.

Try this

Q1. A 3030 N weight hangs 0.800.80 m from a pivot. Calculate the torque it produces about the pivot. [2 points]

  • Cue. τ=rF=(0.80)(30)=24\tau = rF = (0.80)(30) = 24 N\cdotm.

Q2. A rigid body has zero net force but a net torque of 55 N\cdotm. State whether it is in equilibrium and what it does. [1 point]

  • Cue. It is not in equilibrium; the net torque makes it angularly accelerate (start to rotate).

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2024 (style)5 marksSection II (short FRQ, quantitative). A uniform 4.04.0 kg plank 2.02.0 m long rests on a pivot 0.500.50 m from its left end. A 6.06.0 kg mass hangs from the left end. Take g=9.8g = 9.8 m/s squared. (a) Calculate the torque from the hanging mass about the pivot. (b) Calculate where a single supporting force on the right side of the pivot must act, if that force is 8080 N, to keep the plank in rotational equilibrium. Treat the plank's weight as acting at its center. (c) State the two conditions for full equilibrium.
Show worked answer →

A 5-point FRQ on rotational equilibrium with multiple torques.

(a) Torque from hanging mass (2 points): the mass is 0.500.50 m left of the pivot. Its weight is (6.0)(9.8)=58.8(6.0)(9.8) = 58.8 N. Torque =rF=(0.50)(58.8)=29.4= rF = (0.50)(58.8) = 29.4 N\cdotm (counterclockwise about the pivot).
(b) Balancing force position (2 points): the plank's center is at 1.01.0 m from the left end, which is 0.500.50 m right of the pivot; its weight (4.0)(9.8)=39.2(4.0)(9.8) = 39.2 N gives a clockwise torque (0.50)(39.2)=19.6(0.50)(39.2) = 19.6 N\cdotm. For zero net torque the 8080 N force (clockwise, on the right) must supply 29.419.6=9.829.4 - 19.6 = 9.8 N\cdotm: 80×d=9.880 \times d = 9.8, so d=0.1225d = 0.1225 m right of the pivot.
(c) Conditions (1 point): net force zero (F=0\sum F = 0) and net torque zero (τ=0\sum \tau = 0).

Markers reward the torque from the hanging mass, balancing all torques about the pivot, and stating both equilibrium conditions.

AP 2022 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). A rigid object has zero net force but a nonzero net torque acting on it. The object will... (A) remain completely at rest (B) accelerate in a straight line without rotating (C) begin to rotate (angularly accelerate) without its center of mass accelerating (D) both translate and rotate. Justify your reasoning.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point MCQ on the two equilibrium conditions. The answer is (C).

Zero net force means the center of mass does not accelerate (translational equilibrium), but a nonzero net torque means the object angularly accelerates and starts to rotate. Full equilibrium requires both zero net force and zero net torque. The trap is assuming zero net force alone means the object is in equilibrium; it can still spin up.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this