What is an implicitly defined relation, and how does it differ from a function written y = f(x)?
Topic 4.5 Implicitly Defined Functions: interpret a relation given by an equation in x and y, and analyze its graph even when it is not a function of x.
A focused answer to AP Precalculus Topic 4.5, covering relations defined implicitly by an equation in x and y, why they need not pass the vertical line test, and how to analyze their graphs and extract function pieces.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this topic is asking
The College Board (Topic 4.5) wants you to work with implicitly defined relations: a relationship between and given by an equation, such as , that is not solved for . Such a relation need not be a function of ; it can fail the vertical line test. You analyze its graph, and where useful split it into function pieces by solving for .
Relations versus functions
So an implicit equation describes a curve, and whether that curve is a function depends on whether any vertical line meets it more than once.
Why implicit curves can fail the vertical line test
This is exactly why circles, ellipses and hyperbolas are written implicitly: they are not functions, so cannot capture them in one piece.
Reading the graph directly
You can analyze an implicit relation without solving for by testing points and using symmetry. For , the intercepts are where one variable is zero ( and ), and the symmetry in both and (since both appear squared) shows the curve is symmetric about both axes and the origin. Recognizing the standard forms, circle, ellipse, parabola, hyperbola, lets you sketch the curve from the equation, which is the work of Topic 4.6.
A point worth stating once is that switching from implicit to explicit form is sometimes impossible or messy, and that is fine. The implicit equation is itself a complete description of the curve; solving for is only a tool for analysis when it is convenient. Some relations have no clean explicit form at all, yet their graphs are perfectly well defined. Treating the implicit equation as the primary object, rather than always trying to force a form, is the mindset that carries through the conic sections and their parametrisations in Topics 4.6 and 4.7.
Try this
Q1. Does define as a function of ? [1 point]
- Cue. No: for both and work, so it fails the vertical line test; it is a relation, not a function of .
Q2. Solve for the upper half as a function of . [1 point]
- Cue. , with domain .
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
AP 2025 (style)1 marksSection I, Part A (multiple choice, no calculator). The equation defines which kind of relation? (A) A function of (B) A circle, which is not a function of (C) A line (D) A parabolaShow worked answer →
The correct answer is (B), a circle, which is not a function of .
is a circle of radius centered at the origin. It fails the vertical line test (for example gives both and ), so it is not a function of ; it is an implicitly defined relation.
AP 2025 (style)3 marksSection II (free response, no calculator). Consider the implicit relation . (a) Solve for to express the relation as two functions of . (b) State the domain of these functions and explain why two are needed.Show worked answer →
A 3-point question on splitting an implicit relation into functions.
(a) Solve (2 points): , so (the upper semicircle) and (the lower semicircle).
(b) Domain and reason (1 point): both functions have domain , where . Two functions are needed because the full circle assigns two -values to most -values, so no single function of can describe it; splitting into upper and lower halves gives one per on each piece.
Related dot points
- Topic 4.4 Parametrically Defined Circles and Lines: write and interpret parametric equations for circles and lines, controlling radius, center, direction and starting point.
A focused answer to AP Precalculus Topic 4.4, covering the standard parametric forms for lines and circles, how radius, center, direction and starting point appear in the equations, and how to read or build them.
- Topic 4.6 Conic Sections: identify and analyze parabolas, ellipses, circles and hyperbolas from their equations, and describe their key features.
A focused answer to AP Precalculus Topic 4.6, covering the four conic sections, their standard implicit equations, how to read center, radius, vertices and orientation from the equation, and how to tell the conics apart.
- Topic 4.7 Parametrization of Implicitly Defined Functions: find parametric equations that trace an implicitly defined curve, and verify the parametrization satisfies the implicit equation.
A focused answer to AP Precalculus Topic 4.7, covering how to find parametric equations for an implicitly defined curve, the trig parametrization of circles and ellipses, and how to verify a parametrization satisfies the original equation.
- Topic 4.1 Parametric Functions: define a parametric function giving x and y as functions of a parameter t, and graph and interpret the curve it traces.
A focused answer to AP Precalculus Topic 4.1, covering how a parametric function defines x and y each as a function of a parameter t, how to build a table and graph the curve, the direction of motion, and eliminating the parameter.
- Topic 2.8 Inverse Functions: determine whether a function has an inverse, find the inverse by swapping input and output, and verify an inverse using composition and the reflection over the line y = x.
A focused answer to AP Precalculus Topic 2.8, covering one-to-one functions and the horizontal line test, finding an inverse by swapping variables, verifying with composition, and the reflection over y = x.
Sources & how we know this
- AP Precalculus Course and Exam Description — College Board (2023)