← Seminar syllabus

United StatesSeminar

Unit 1: Research and Analysis Skills (QUEST 1 to 3)

7 dot points across 7 inquiry questions. Click any dot point for a focused answer with worked past exam questions where available.

How do you weigh several perspectives on an issue against one another?

Evaluate Multiple Perspectives (QUEST big idea 3): consider and evaluate multiple perspectives on an issue, individually and in comparison, identifying points of agreement, tension, and the assumptions behind each.
A focused guide to the third QUEST skill: how to identify and evaluate multiple perspectives on a complex issue, compare them for agreement and tension, surface the assumptions and values behind each, and why holding several credible viewpoints together is the foundation of synthesis and the Performance Tasks.
10 min answer →

How do you judge whether a source is credible and its evidence trustworthy?

Evaluating source credibility (QUEST big ideas 2 to 3): judge a source's credibility and the quality of its evidence using author expertise, currency, publisher, purpose, and corroboration, and assess whether evidence is relevant and sufficient.
How AP Seminar students judge the credibility of a source and the quality of its evidence, using author expertise, currency, publisher and purpose, and corroboration, and how to decide whether evidence is relevant and sufficient, the skill behind the third Part A question and the foundation of fair synthesis.
11 min answer →

How do you find relevant sources and read them efficiently for what an argument claims?

Finding and reading sources (QUEST big idea 1, applied): locate relevant and credible sources across types, read strategically for the central argument, and recognize primary, secondary, scholarly, and popular sources.
How AP Seminar students locate relevant sources, distinguish primary from secondary and scholarly from popular sources, and read strategically for an argument's claim and reasoning rather than line by line, building the evidence base for analysis, evaluation, and synthesis.
9 min answer →

How do bias, context, and assumptions shape an argument, and how do you account for them?

Identifying bias and context (QUEST big ideas 2 to 3): recognize an author's perspective, bias, assumptions, and the context of an argument, and account for how these shape the claims and evidence.
How AP Seminar students recognize an author's perspective, bias, assumptions, and context, distinguish bias from mere perspective, spot common logical fallacies, and account for how these shape an argument, deepening both source evaluation and the credibility judgements behind synthesis.
10 min answer →

How do you turn a broad interest into a focused, researchable question worth investigating?

Question and Explore (QUEST big idea 1): explore a complex issue, identify what is at stake and what is unknown, and narrow it to a focused, researchable, and arguable research question.
A focused guide to the first QUEST skill, Question and Explore: how to move from a broad topic to a narrow, researchable, and arguable research question, how to test a question for scope and arguability, and why the quality of your question shapes every later stage of AP Seminar inquiry.
10 min answer →

What is the QUEST framework, and how does the inquiry process turn curiosity into a defensible argument?

QUEST overview: the five big ideas (Question and Explore, Understand and Analyze, Evaluate Multiple Perspectives, Synthesize Ideas, Team Transform and Transmit) and how the inquiry process runs from a research question to an evidence-based argument.
An orientation to AP Seminar: the QUEST framework of five big ideas, what each skill demands, and how the inquiry process moves from posing a research question through analyzing and evaluating sources to synthesizing a defensible, evidence-based argument across the two Performance Tasks and the End-of-Course Exam.
11 min answer →

How do you analyze an argument by identifying its claim, line of reasoning, and evidence?

Understand and Analyze (QUEST big idea 2): contextualize an argument and identify its central claim, supporting claims, line of reasoning, and the evidence used, in order to explain how the argument is built.
A focused guide to the second QUEST skill: how to analyze an argument by identifying its central claim, supporting claims, line of reasoning, and evidence, how to contextualize the author and situation, and why explaining how an argument is built is different from summarizing what it says, the core of End-of-Course Exam Part A.
11 min answer →