Skip to main content
GeorgiaEnglish LiteratureSyllabus dot point

How do you identify an author's purpose and the rhetorical choices (appeals, word choice, structure) that serve it, and explain their effect on the reader?

Author's purpose and rhetoric: determining an author's purpose (to inform, persuade, analyze, or reflect), identifying rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) and devices (word choice, repetition, rhetorical questions, structure), and explaining how these choices advance the purpose on a Georgia Milestones informational passage.

How to analyze an author's purpose and rhetoric on the Georgia Milestones American Literature EOC: identifying purpose, recognizing the rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) and devices, and explaining how a choice advances the purpose and affects the reader rather than just naming it.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this skill is asking
  2. Purpose and the three appeals
  3. Devices and linking them to purpose
  4. Putting it together
  5. Try this

What this skill is asking

Every informational text is written for a purpose (to inform, persuade, analyze, or reflect), and writers use rhetoric (the appeals and devices that shape how a message lands) to achieve it. The Georgia Milestones American Literature EOC asks you to identify the purpose and explain how rhetorical choices advance it. A question may ask why an author includes a personal story, what an appeal accomplishes, or how word choice shapes the reader's response. This page covers identifying purpose, the three classical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), common rhetorical devices, and the move that earns marks: linking a choice to the purpose and its effect. The transferable skill is reading nonfiction as a designed act of communication, then explaining how the design works on the reader.

Purpose and the three appeals

Start with why the text exists, then how it works on you.

A reliable habit is to ask, after the first read, "What does this author want, and how are they trying to get it?" The first answer is the purpose; the second points to the rhetoric. American speeches and essays on the EOC often blend appeals deliberately, a personal anecdote (ethos and pathos) followed by data (logos), so be ready to name more than one appeal and say what each contributes.

Devices and linking them to purpose

This linking move is the difference between identifying rhetoric and analyzing it. The EOC frequently asks why an author made a choice, and the answer is the effect on the reader in service of the purpose. A personal story is not just "an anecdote"; it builds the speaker's credibility and the reader's sympathy, which is why the persuasive author chose it.

Putting it together

Try this

Q1. What are the three classical rhetorical appeals? [Recall]

  • Cue. Ethos (persuading through the speaker's credibility or character), pathos (persuading through emotion), and logos (persuading through logic, facts, and reasoning). Most persuasive texts blend them.

Q2. A writer wanting to persuade readers to protect a local forest opens with a childhood memory of playing there. What does the anecdote accomplish, and how does it serve the purpose? [Short explanation]

  • Cue. The anecdote builds pathos (emotional connection to the forest) and ethos (the writer's genuine stake), making the cause personal and the writer credible, which serves the persuasive purpose by drawing the reader emotionally toward protecting the forest before any argument is made.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of GaDOE exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

GA Milestones Am Lit (MC)1 marksIn a speech urging people to vote, the speaker says, 'I have stood in those long lines myself, in the rain, because this right was paid for in struggle.' Which appeal is the speaker most using? (1) Logos, an appeal to logic. (2) Pathos and ethos, an appeal to emotion and to the speaker's own credibility and shared experience. (3) A statistic. (4) A counterclaim.
Show worked answer →

Answer: (2). "I have stood in those long lines myself" builds ethos (the speaker's credibility through shared experience), and "paid for in struggle" stirs pathos (emotion about sacrifice). Together they move the audience to value voting, which is the purpose.

Why not the others: (1) logos appeals to logic or data, not present here; (3) there is no statistic; (4) no opposing view is raised. Recognizing the emotional and credibility appeals is the point, so (2) is correct.

GA Milestones Am Lit (CR)2 marksConstructed response. Identify the author's purpose and explain how one rhetorical choice advances it. Use evidence from the text. (Scored on a 2-point constructed-response rubric.)
Show worked answer →

A full-credit response names the purpose and links a rhetorical choice to it, for example: "The author's purpose is to persuade readers to conserve water. The repetition of 'every drop' across the essay drives the urgency of small actions, advancing the persuasive purpose by making conservation feel both important and achievable."

Markers reward stating the purpose, then explaining how a specific choice (an appeal, repetition, word choice, structure) serves it, with evidence. Naming a device with no link to purpose ("the author repeats words") earns partial credit at most.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this