What are the stages of plot and the kinds of conflict, and why does the order a writer chooses to tell events in matter to the meaning?
Plot, conflict, and structure in literary texts: the stages of plot (exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, resolution), internal and external conflict, and analyzing how an author's structural choices (event order, flashback, foreshadowing, pacing) create effects such as tension, mystery, or surprise on a LEAP English I or II literary passage.
How to analyze plot, conflict, and structure on a LEAP English I or II literary passage: the stages of plot, internal versus external conflict, and why an author's choices about event order, flashback, and pacing create tension, mystery, or surprise. Structure questions reward explaining the effect, not just labeling the stage.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this skill is asking
Plot is the sequence of events in a story, conflict is the struggle that drives it, and structure is how the writer arranges the telling. LEAP English I and II ask about all three, and the higher-value questions are about structure: not "what happened" but "why did the writer tell it in this order, and what does that do?" You will see multiple-choice items ("which kind of conflict"), hot-text items ("click the sentence that marks the turning point"), and evidence-based items that pair a structural reading with its supporting line. This page covers the stages of plot, the kinds of conflict, and, most importantly, how to analyze an author's structural choices, because Louisiana standard RL.9-10.5 asks you to explain how those choices create effects like tension, mystery, and surprise. The transferable skill is treating structure as a deliberate choice with an effect you can explain.
The stages of plot and the kinds of conflict
Knowing the vocabulary lets you answer quickly, but the test rewards using it to analyze.
A frequent error is calling the most exciting scene the climax. The climax is structural: it is where the main conflict reaches its turning point and the outcome stops being in doubt. Identifying the central conflict first makes the climax easy to locate, because the climax is the moment that conflict turns. Louisiana standard RL.9-10.3 asks you to analyze how complex characters and events interact and advance the plot, so the stages and conflicts are tools for that analysis, not an end in themselves.
Why structure is a choice with an effect
Writers rarely tell events in the plain order they happened, and the order is meaningful.
This is the difference between a Basic and a Mastery answer on a structure item. "The author uses a flashback" labels the device. "The author uses a flashback so the reader already knows the outcome, which turns the earlier events into a source of dramatic irony" analyzes it. The same habit powers a strong Literary Analysis Task essay, where a paragraph on structure must explain effect to develop the claim, and it connects directly to text structure in informational texts, where organization is also a deliberate choice.
Putting it together on a passage
Try this
Q1. What is the climax of a plot, and how is it different from the most exciting moment? [Recall]
- Cue. The climax is the turning point of the main conflict, after which the outcome is no longer in doubt. It is defined by the conflict, not by excitement, so it can be a quiet decision.
Q2. A story is told out of order, opening with a funeral and then showing the events that led to the death. What is the likely effect, and how would you support it? [Short explanation]
- Cue. The effect is suspense and a sense of inevitability: the reader knows the outcome and reads the build-up looking for its cause, which weights ordinary events with consequence. Support it by pointing to the opening funeral and a built-up moment the reader now reads differently. That is the analysis RL.9-10.5 wants.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of LDOE exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
LEAP 2025 English I (style)1 marksIn a story, the protagonist must choose between reporting a friend's cheating and staying loyal, while also doubting whether she has the courage to speak up. Which best describes the conflict? (1) Character versus nature only. (2) Both an external conflict (with her friend and the situation) and an internal conflict (her own self-doubt). (3) There is no conflict. (4) Character versus society only.Show worked answer →
Answer: (2). The clash with her friend and the cheating situation is an external conflict (character versus character or society); her doubt about her own courage is an internal conflict (character versus self). Strong passages often run both at once, and the best answer names both rather than forcing a single label.
Why not the others: (1) and (4) each capture only part of the conflict; (3) ignores a clear struggle. Louisiana standard RL.9-10.3 asks you to analyze how characters and events interact, so spotting both layers is the point.
LEAP 2025 English II (style)2 marksA writer opens at the moment a character is about to be arrested, then uses a flashback to show the weeks leading up to it. Explain the effect of this structural choice. (2 points: state the effect and support it.)Show worked answer →
Opening at the arrest raises a question the reader immediately wants answered (how did this happen?), which creates suspense. The flashback then supplies the cause, so the reader experiences the build-up already knowing where it leads, which weights ordinary events with consequence and a sense of inevitability.
A full-credit answer names the effect (suspense, dramatic irony, or tension) and ties it to the structure (the out-of-order telling). Louisiana standard RL.9-10.5 specifically asks you to analyze how an author's choices about ordering events and manipulating time create effects such as mystery, tension, or surprise, so explaining the effect, not just naming the flashback, is what earns the marks.
Related dot points
- Analyzing theme and central idea in literary texts: stating a theme as a complete sentence about life or human nature (not a topic word), distinguishing theme from subject and from moral, and tracing how a writer develops a theme through plot, character, and detail across a LEAP English I or II literary passage.
How to analyze theme on a LEAP English I or II literary passage: stating theme as a full sentence about life rather than a one-word topic, telling theme apart from subject and moral, and tracing how plot, character, and detail develop it. Theme appears in multiple-choice, hot-text, and evidence-based items, and it anchors the Literary Analysis Task.
- Character and point of view in literary texts: inferring traits and motivation from indirect characterization (actions, dialogue, thoughts, and others' reactions), tracking how a character changes, and analyzing how the point of view (first person, third-person limited, third-person omniscient) shapes what the reader knows on a LEAP English I or II literary passage.
How to analyze character and point of view on a LEAP English I or II literary passage: inferring traits from indirect characterization, tracking change, and explaining how first person, third-person limited, or omniscient narration shapes what the reader knows. The EOC tests inference and effect, not labels alone.
- Figurative language and literary devices in literary texts: identifying simile, metaphor, personification, imagery, symbolism, hyperbole, and tone, and analyzing the effect of these choices and of an author's word choice on meaning and tone, on a LEAP English I or II literary passage.
How to analyze figurative language and literary devices on a LEAP English I or II literary passage: identifying simile, metaphor, personification, imagery, symbolism, and tone, and, crucially, explaining their effect. LEAP rewards analysis of how word choice shapes meaning and tone, not just labeling devices.
- Text structure and organization in informational texts: recognizing common organizational patterns (cause and effect, compare and contrast, problem and solution, chronological or sequence, and description), analyzing how sentences and paragraphs develop ideas, and explaining why an author's structural choice suits the content on a LEAP English I or II informational passage.
How to analyze text structure on a LEAP English I or II informational passage: recognizing patterns like cause and effect, compare and contrast, and problem and solution, and explaining why an author's structure suits the ideas. Louisiana standard RI.9-10.5 rewards analyzing how parts develop ideas, not just labeling the pattern.
- The Literary Analysis Task on LEAP English I and II: reading one or more literary texts, building an analytic claim about how the author develops theme, character, or structure, and writing an essay that supports the claim with specific text evidence and explanation, scored on the combined Reading Comprehension and Written Expression dimension plus Knowledge of Language and Conventions.
How to write a strong Literary Analysis Task essay on LEAP English I and II: reading the literary text or texts, making an analytic claim about how the author develops theme, character, or structure, and supporting it with specific evidence and explanation. Scored on combined Reading Comprehension and Written Expression plus conventions.
Sources & how we know this
- LEAP 2025 Assessment Guide for English I and English II — LDOE (2025)
- Louisiana Student Standards for English Language Arts — LDOE (2025)