Skip to main content
LouisianaMathsSyllabus dot point

How do you solve a linear inequality, and why does the inequality sign flip when you multiply or divide by a negative?

Solve linear inequalities in one variable and graph the solution set on a number line, reversing the inequality when multiplying or dividing by a negative (LA A1: A-REI.B.3).

A Louisiana LEAP 2025 Algebra I answer on solving linear inequalities (LA A1: A-REI.B.3): the same steps as equations, flipping the sign for a negative multiply or divide, and graphing the solution on a number line.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Solving like an equation, with one exception
  3. The sign-flip rule
  4. Graphing the solution on a number line
  5. Reading "between" with a compound inequality
  6. How LEAP examines this topic
  7. Why a negative flip is necessary
  8. Try this

What this topic is asking

Standard A1: A-REI.B.3 also covers linear inequalities in one variable: solve them and graph the solution set on a number line. On LEAP 2025 these are Type I Major Content items, and they appear on the no-calculator Session 1a. The one rule that makes inequalities different from equations is the sign flip on a negative multiply or divide.

Solving like an equation, with one exception

The steps mirror equation solving: simplify each side, gather the variable on one side and constants on the other, then divide by the coefficient.

When the coefficient is positive, nothing special happens, the inequality reads the same way throughout.

The sign-flip rule

The one rule unique to inequalities: multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative reverses the inequality.

Adding or subtracting never flips the sign; only a negative multiply or divide does. This is why gathering the variable on the side where its coefficient stays positive can avoid the flip entirely.

Graphing the solution on a number line

The solution to a one-variable inequality is a ray (or segment) on the number line:

  • Open circle at the endpoint for << or >> (the endpoint is not a solution).
  • Closed circle at the endpoint for \le or \ge (the endpoint is a solution).
  • Shade toward the values that work: right for "greater than," left for "less than."

For x5x \ge -5: a closed circle at 5-5, shaded to the right. The shaded ray represents infinitely many solutions, every value in that direction, which is what makes an inequality different from an equation that has a single answer. To check a solution, pick any value in the shaded region and confirm it satisfies the original inequality: for x5x \ge -5, testing x=0x = 0 in 3x+419-3x + 4 \le 19 gives 4194 \le 19, true, so the shading direction is right.

Reading "between" with a compound inequality

Some LEAP items describe a value that lies between two bounds, written as a compound inequality such as 2x<5-2 \le x < 5. This is shorthand for two conditions at once: x2x \ge -2 and x<5x < 5. On a number line it is a segment with a closed circle at 2-2 (included) and an open circle at 55 (excluded), shaded in between. Solve a compound inequality by performing each operation on all three parts at the same time, and remember the sign-flip rule still applies if you multiply or divide the whole chain by a negative.

How LEAP examines this topic

  • Equation response. Solve and enter the inequality (for example x5x \ge -5).
  • Graphing item. Place the endpoint circle and shade the correct direction on a number line.
  • Multiple choice. Match a solution to its number-line graph, with open-versus-closed and direction distractors.

Why a negative flip is necessary

The sign flip is not an arbitrary rule, it keeps the inequality true, which is the reasoning A-REI.B.3 wants you to understand. Start with a true statement like 3<53 < 5. Multiply both sides by 1-1: the left becomes 3-3 and the right becomes 5-5. But 3>5-3 > -5, not 3<5-3 < -5, because on the number line 3-3 sits to the right of 5-5. Multiplying by a negative reflects every number across zero, which reverses their order, so the only way to keep a true statement true is to reverse the inequality sign as well. Equations do not have this issue because == has no direction to reverse: 3=33 = 3 stays true when both sides are negated to 3=3-3 = -3. Seeing the flip as "negation reverses order on the number line" makes it automatic, and it explains why the rule applies to multiplying and dividing (which can negate) but never to adding or subtracting (which only shift).

Try this

Q1. Solve 52x115 - 2x \ge 11. [2 points]

  • Cue. 2x6-2x \ge 6, divide by 2-2 and flip: x3x \le -3.

Q2. How is x2x \le 2 graphed? [1 point]

  • Cue. Closed circle at 22, shaded to the left.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of LDOE exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

LA LEAP 2025 Math (style)2 marksEquation response. Solve the inequality 3x+419-3x + 4 \le 19.
Show worked answer →

The solution is x5x \ge -5.

Subtract 44 from both sides: 3x15-3x \le 15. Now divide both sides by 3-3, and because you are dividing by a negative, reverse the inequality: x5x \ge -5. The single most common error is leaving the sign as \le; dividing or multiplying by a negative always flips the direction.

LA LEAP 2025 Math (style)1 marksMultiple choice. The solution to an inequality is x>3x > 3. How is this graphed on a number line? (A) open circle at 3, shaded to the right (B) closed circle at 3, shaded to the right (C) open circle at 3, shaded to the left (D) closed circle at 3, shaded to the left
Show worked answer →

The correct answer is (A).

A strict inequality (>> or <<) uses an open circle because 33 itself is not included, and x>3x > 3 means all values greater than 33, so shade to the right. A closed (filled) circle is used only for \ge or \le, where the endpoint is included. Reading the endpoint type and the direction is the skill here.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this