Skip to main content
New YorkBiologySyllabus dot point

What lines of evidence show that species have evolved from common ancestors?

Describe the lines of evidence for evolution (fossils, comparative anatomy, embryology and molecular/DNA evidence) and explain how each supports common ancestry (NYSSLS LS4, patterns; structure and function).

A NYSSLS-level answer on the evidence for evolution for the New York Life Science: Biology Regents: the fossil record, comparative anatomy and homologous structures, embryology, and molecular evidence such as DNA, and how each supports common ancestry.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The fossil record
  3. Comparative anatomy and homologous structures
  4. Embryology
  5. Molecular evidence
  6. Putting the evidence together
  7. Try this

What this topic is asking

NYSSLS LS4 wants you to know the lines of evidence that show species have evolved from common ancestors, and to explain how each one supports that conclusion. On the Life Science: Biology Regents this often comes as a cluster using homologous structures (such as forelimbs) or molecular comparisons (echoing the Relationships and Biodiversity lab). The crosscutting concepts are patterns and structure and function.

The fossil record

Fossils show that the kinds of organisms on Earth have changed over time: older rock layers contain simpler or different forms, and newer layers contain forms more like modern species. Transitional fossils show intermediate features between older and newer groups, supporting the idea that one form gave rise to another. The fossil record is a direct record of change through time.

Comparative anatomy and homologous structures

This is a powerful pattern: there is no design reason for a swimming flipper and a flying wing to share the same bones, unless they were inherited from a shared ancestor and modified. Comparative anatomy thus points to common ancestry.

Embryology

The embryos of related species often look very similar in their early stages, even when the adults are very different. These shared early features suggest the species inherited a common developmental plan from a shared ancestor. Embryological similarity is another pattern consistent with common descent.

Molecular evidence

The strongest modern evidence is molecular. Because DNA codes for proteins and is inherited, the DNA and protein sequences of different species can be compared directly. The more similar two species' DNA or proteins are, the more recently they are likely to have shared a common ancestor. For example, species we judge to be closely related on other grounds also turn out to have very similar DNA. This is exactly what the Relationships and Biodiversity investigation explores, comparing structural and molecular features to infer relatedness.

Putting the evidence together

No single line of evidence stands alone; their strength is that they agree. Fossils, anatomy, embryology and molecules independently point to the same family tree of life, with species linked by common ancestry (developed further in common ancestry and phylogeny). When the exam asks for evidence, give a line and explain how it supports a shared ancestor.

Try this

Q1. Define a homologous structure and give an example. [2]

  • Cue. A body part with the same basic plan but a different function in different species; for example the forelimb of a human, whale and bat.

Q2. Explain why similar DNA between two species is evidence that they are closely related. [2]

  • Cue. DNA is inherited; the more similar two species' DNA, the more recently they likely shared a common ancestor, so molecular similarity indicates relatedness.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of NYSED exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Regents (Life Science sample, 2024)3 marksThe forelimbs of a human, a whale and a bat have very different functions (grasping, swimming, flying) but the same arrangement of bones. (a) State the term for structures with the same basic plan but different functions. (b) Explain how these structures provide evidence for evolution. (c) State one other line of evidence that supports common ancestry.
Show worked answer →

A 3-point constructed-response item assessing patterns and structure and function.

(a) 1 point: homologous structures.
(b) 1 point: the shared underlying bone arrangement suggests the species inherited the limb from a common ancestor and then it was modified by natural selection for different functions.
(c) 1 point: any other valid line, for example the fossil record, similarities in embryos, or molecular evidence (similar DNA or proteins).

Markers reward "homologous structures", the common-ancestor explanation, and one further line of evidence.

Regents (Life Science CR, 2025)2 marksIn the Relationships and Biodiversity investigation, students compare structural and molecular features of several plant species to a known species. (a) Explain why comparing DNA or proteins is strong evidence of how closely related two species are. (b) State what a greater number of similarities suggests about two species.
Show worked answer →

A 2-point item built on the Relationships and Biodiversity lab.

(a) 1 point: DNA and proteins are the inherited molecular instructions; the more similar two species' DNA or proteins are, the more recently they are likely to have shared a common ancestor, so molecular similarity is direct evidence of relatedness.
(b) 1 point: more similarities suggest the two species are more closely related (shared a more recent common ancestor).

Markers reward "more similar molecules means more closely related/more recent common ancestor".

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this