Skip to main content
New YorkEarth and Environmental ScienceSyllabus dot point

How do we work out the order of events in the rock record without knowing exact ages?

Apply the principles of relative dating (superposition, original horizontality, cross-cutting relationships, inclusions and unconformities) to order events in a sequence of rock layers.

A Regents answer on relative dating: the law of superposition, original horizontality, cross-cutting relationships, inclusions, and how unconformities record missing time, used to put events in order in a cross-section, plus how faults, intrusions and contact metamorphism fit the sequence, with worked exam questions.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.812 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The principles of relative dating
  3. Cross-cutting, inclusions and contact metamorphism
  4. Unconformities: the missing time
  5. Reading a cross-section
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

The Regents wants you to order events in the rock record using the principles of relative dating: superposition, original horizontality, cross-cutting relationships, inclusions and unconformities. Almost every question is a cross-section you must put in order from oldest to youngest.

The principles of relative dating

Cross-cutting, inclusions and contact metamorphism

These three together let you order intrusions and faults relative to layers:

  • Cross-cutting relationships: a fault or an igneous intrusion that cuts through layers is younger than every layer it cuts. If an intrusion cuts layers A, B and C but not D, the intrusion is younger than C and older than D.
  • Inclusions: if layer B contains fragments (inclusions) of layer A, then A must already have existed to be broken up, so A is older than B.
  • Contact metamorphism: an intrusion bakes the rock it touches, leaving a metamorphosed zone along the contact. The baked zone confirms the intrusion is younger than the rock it altered.

Unconformities: the missing time

Reading a cross-section

To order a cross-section from oldest to youngest:

  1. Lay down the sedimentary layers from the bottom up (superposition), assuming they started horizontal.
  2. Add deformation (folds, tilts) after the layers they affect.
  3. Add intrusions and faults after the rock they cut (cross-cutting), using contact metamorphism and inclusions to confirm order.
  4. Mark unconformities as erosion events at the gaps.

Try this

Q1. State the law of superposition. [1 point]

  • Cue. In an undisturbed sequence of sedimentary layers, each layer is younger than the one below it (oldest at the bottom).

Q2. Explain why an igneous intrusion that cuts a layer must be younger than that layer. [2 points]

  • Cue. By cross-cutting relationships, the layer had to already exist for the intrusion to cut through it, so the intrusion formed afterward.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of NYSED exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Regents (style)1 marksPart A. In an undisturbed sequence of sedimentary rock layers, the oldest layer is normally found (1) at the top (2) at the bottom (3) in the middle (4) it cannot be determined. Justify your choice.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point multiple-choice question. The answer is (2).

By the law of superposition, in an undisturbed sequence each layer is younger than the one below it, so the oldest layer is at the bottom and the youngest at the top. (1) is the youngest layer; (3) is intermediate; (4) is wrong because superposition does determine the order in an undisturbed sequence. The trap is forgetting the "undisturbed" condition; if the layers were overturned by folding, the order could be reversed.

Regents (style)3 marksPart C. A cross-section shows four horizontal sedimentary layers (A oldest at the bottom up to D), an igneous intrusion that cuts through layers A, B and C but not D, and a fault that cuts the intrusion. (a) State which is older, the intrusion or layer C, and why. (b) State which is older, the intrusion or layer D, and why. (c) Place the fault in the sequence.
Show worked answer →

A 3-point extended-response question.

(a) 1 point: layer C is older than the intrusion, because the intrusion cuts across (and therefore postdates) layer C (cross-cutting relationships).
(b) 1 point: layer D is younger than the intrusion, because the intrusion does not cut D; D was deposited after the intrusion was already in place.
(c) 1 point: the fault cuts the intrusion, so the fault is younger than the intrusion (and younger than layers A, B, C); it is among the most recent events, after the intrusion.

Markers reward applying cross-cutting relationships in both directions and placing the fault after the feature it cuts.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this