← English Language syllabus

New YorkEnglish Language

The Argument Essay

6 dot points across 6 inquiry questions. Click any dot point for a focused answer with worked past exam questions where available.

How do you distinguish your claim from opposing claims, and answer a counterclaim without weakening your own position?

Addressing counterclaims: identifying the strongest opposing claim from the texts, acknowledging it fairly, and answering it with a rebuttal that strengthens rather than weakens your position, as the task's direction to distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims.
How to distinguish your claim from opposing claims on the Regents Part 2 argument: identifying the strongest counterclaim from the texts, acknowledging it fairly, and rebutting it so your position is strengthened, the move behind the task's instruction to distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims.
9 min answer →

How do you write a precise, defensible claim that takes a position, and why is a precise claim worth so much on the rubric?

Establishing a precise claim: writing a single, defensible claim that takes a clear position on the Part 2 issue, distinguishing a precise claim from a vague or two-sided one, and placing it so it controls the whole argument.
How to write a precise, defensible claim for the Regents Part 2 argument: taking a clear position on the issue, the difference between a precise claim and a vague or fence-sitting one, and placing the claim so it controls the whole essay. The Content and Analysis criterion rewards a precise and insightful claim.
9 min answer →

How do you weave evidence from at least three sources into one argument instead of summarizing each text in turn?

Integrating evidence from multiple sources: selecting specific and relevant evidence from at least three of the four texts, weaving it across paragraphs organized by reason rather than by source, and explaining how each piece supports the claim, as the Command of Evidence criterion requires.
How to integrate evidence from at least three Regents Part 2 sources: selecting specific and relevant evidence, organizing paragraphs by reason rather than by text, and weaving evidence from several sources into one point. The Command of Evidence criterion rewards highly effective use of specific evidence from multiple texts.
9 min answer →

How do you structure the Part 2 argument so it is coherent, well-organized, and written in a formal style?

Organizing the argument essay: a coherent structure for the Part 2 argument (introduction with claim, reason-based body paragraphs, a counterclaim paragraph, conclusion), using transitions and a formal style, as the Coherence, Organization, and Style criterion requires.
How to structure the Regents Part 2 argument: an introduction that states the claim, body paragraphs organized by reason, a counterclaim paragraph, and a conclusion, joined by transitions and written in a formal style. The Coherence, Organization, and Style criterion rewards logical organization and a formal voice.
9 min answer →

What do the four criteria of the 6-point argument rubric reward, and how do you write toward a 5 or 6?

The argument rubric and scoring: the four criteria of the Part 2 6-point holistic rubric (Content and Analysis, Command of Evidence, Coherence/Organization/Style, Control of Conventions), what each rewards at the top bands, and what separates a 6 from a 4 and a 4 from a 2.
How the Regents Part 2 argument is scored: the four criteria of the 6-point holistic rubric (Content and Analysis, Command of Evidence, Coherence/Organization/Style, Control of Conventions), what each rewards at the top, and what separates a 6 from a 4 and analysis from summary.
9 min answer →

What exactly does Part 2 ask, and how is the source-based argument different from a personal opinion essay?

Understanding the source-based argument: the Part 2 task (four texts on one issue, take a position, use at least three sources), how it differs from a personal-opinion essay, and what each line of the task directions requires.
What Part 2 of the Regents ELA exam asks: four texts on one issue, establish a precise claim, distinguish it from opposing claims, and use specific evidence from at least three of the texts. How the source-based argument differs from a personal-opinion essay, line by line through the task directions.
9 min answer →