How do you infer a character's traits and motivation from the text, and how does the narrator's point of view shape what the reader is allowed to know?
Analyzing character and point of view in literary texts: inferring traits and motivation from a character's words, actions, and thoughts (indirect characterization), tracking how a character changes, and explaining how the narrator's point of view (first person, third limited, third omniscient) controls what the reader knows on an Ohio English II literary passage.
How to analyze character and point of view on the Ohio English II test: inferring traits from actions (indirect characterization), tracking change, and explaining how first-person and third-person narration shape what the reader knows. The test rewards inference backed by a line, not labels.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this skill is asking
Character is who the people in a story are, and point of view is the vantage from which the story is told. On Ohio's State Test for English Language Arts II, character questions ask you to infer a trait, a motivation, or a change from the text, almost always from what a character does rather than from a label the writer hands you. Point-of-view questions ask you to explain how the narrator's vantage controls what the reader is allowed to know and feel. Both sit under Craft and Structure in Ohio's Learning Standards, and both reward inference backed by evidence over the naming of terms. This page covers direct and indirect characterization, how to track a character's change, the main points of view, and how each one shapes the reader's knowledge.
Direct and indirect characterization
A character who shares his lunch without being asked, returns money he could keep, and stays calm when provoked is being shown as generous, honest, and self-possessed, even if none of those words appear. When an item asks "what does this action reveal about the character," resist answering with a plot summary; name the trait and let the action be the proof. This habit also feeds the evidence-based items, where Part B asks for the line that supports the trait you chose in Part A.
Tracking change
Because change so often states the theme, this skill connects directly to analyzing theme in literary texts: a character's arc is one of the surest places a theme lives. It also connects to conflict, because a character is revealed most clearly by how they meet a struggle, which ties back to plot, conflict, and structure.
Point of view and what the reader knows
The narrator's vantage is a choice with consequences, and the test asks you to read those consequences.
Try this
Q1. What is the difference between direct and indirect characterization, and which does the test mostly use? [Recall]
- Cue. Direct states a trait in words; indirect shows it through speech, action, or thought and the reader infers it. The English II test mostly uses indirect characterization, so judge a character by behavior and supply the line.
Q2. A story is told by a narrator who is a minor character watching the hero from the outside. Explain one effect of this point of view. [Short explanation]
- Cue. The reader sees the hero only from the outside, so the hero's true motives stay partly hidden, which can build mystery, admiration, or misjudgement. Name the effect on the reader's knowledge, not just the point of view.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of ODEW exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Ohio English II EOC (style)1 marksA character says little but quietly returns a wallet he found and helps a classmate who had mocked him. The reader learns he is decent and forgiving. This is an example of: (1) direct characterization (2) indirect characterization (3) point of view (4) a flashback.Show worked answer →
Answer: (2). The writer never states the trait outright; the reader infers "decent and forgiving" from the character's actions. That is indirect characterization, and it is what the English II test mostly asks you to do: judge a character by behavior and supply the line that shows it.
Direct characterization (1) would state the trait in words ("he was a forgiving boy"). Point of view (3) and a flashback (4) are different ideas. The actions are the evidence for the inference.
Ohio English II (2-part)2 marksTwo-part item. Part A: A story is narrated in the first person by a character inside the events. How does this point of view shape what the reader knows? Part B: Select the line that best shows the limit of the narrator's knowledge.Show worked answer →
Part A: a first-person narrator reports only what they observe, are told, or feel, so other characters' inner lives reach the reader only indirectly, and the narrator may misjudge things. The fullest answer names this limit and its effect (suspense, sympathy, or irony).
Part B: the supporting line is usually a moment where the narrator admits uncertainty or guesses at another character's feelings ("I could not tell what she was thinking"). The two parts must agree: Part B should show the very limit Part A describes.
Related dot points
- Analyzing theme and central idea in literary texts: stating a theme as a complete sentence about life or human nature rather than a topic word, distinguishing theme from subject and from moral, and tracing how a writer develops a theme through plot, character, and detail across an unseen Ohio English II literary passage.
How to analyze theme on an Ohio English II literary passage: stating theme as a full sentence about life rather than a one-word topic, telling theme apart from subject and moral, and tracing how plot, character, and detail develop it. Theme appears in multiple-choice, multi-select, and evidence-based two-part items.
- Analyzing plot, conflict, and structure in literary texts: the stages of plot (exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, resolution), internal and external conflict, and how a writer's structural choices (order of events, flashback, foreshadowing, pacing) shape meaning on an Ohio English II literary passage.
How to analyze plot, conflict, and structure on the Ohio English II test: the five stages of plot, internal versus external conflict, and why a writer's ordering choices (flashback, foreshadowing, pacing) matter. Structure items reward explaining the effect of a choice, not just naming the stage.
- Analyzing figurative language and literary devices in literary texts: identifying simile, metaphor, personification, imagery, symbolism, hyperbole, and tone, and explaining the effect each creates (the feeling, picture, or meaning it builds) on an Ohio English II literary passage, rather than only labelling the device.
How to analyze figurative language and literary devices on the Ohio English II test: identifying simile, metaphor, personification, imagery, symbolism, and tone, and explaining their effect, not just naming them. The high-value move is what the device does, the feeling or meaning it builds.
- Making inferences and citing text evidence on the Ohio English II test: drawing a logical inference from what a text states and implies, distinguishing an inference from a guess and from a restatement, citing the strongest evidence that supports an analysis, and handling evidence-based two-part items where Part A is the inference and Part B is the supporting line.
How to make inferences and cite evidence on the Ohio English II test: drawing a logical inference, telling it apart from a guess or a restatement, and citing the strongest supporting line. The evidence-based two-part items make this the most tested habit on the whole test.
- Reading poetry on the Ohio English II test: paraphrasing a poem for meaning (speaker, situation, feeling) before analyzing form, reading structure (stanzas, line breaks, refrain) and sound (rhyme, rhythm, repetition) as carriers of meaning, and explaining how a poem's figurative language builds its central idea on an unseen poem.
How to read poetry on the Ohio English II test: paraphrase for meaning first (speaker, situation, feeling), then read structure and sound as carriers of meaning. Poetry items reward connecting form to meaning, not naming meter or rhyme scheme for its own sake.
Sources & how we know this
- ELA II course resources — ODEW (2025)
- Ohio's Learning Standards for English Language Arts — ODEW (2025)