English Language syllabus, dot point by dot point

Editing for grammar and usage: identifying and correcting the grammar and usage errors STAAR tests, subject-verb agreement, pronoun-antecedent agreement and pronoun case, verb tense consistency, and misplaced or dangling modifiers, in a student draft and in your own writing.

The revising and editing question types: how STAAR presents revising and editing as multiple-choice questions on a student draft, how to read the prompt to tell a revising task (meaning, organization) from an editing task (grammar, mechanics), and how the new item formats apply to these questions.

Revising for clarity and organization: improving a draft's meaning rather than its mechanics, adding or sharpening a supporting detail, reordering sentences for logical flow, choosing effective transitions, and deciding whether a sentence belongs, the focus of STAAR revising questions.

Sentence boundaries and punctuation: recognizing and fixing fragments, run-ons, and comma splices, and applying the core punctuation rules STAAR tests, commas in compound sentences and lists, semicolons between independent clauses, and apostrophes for possession and contraction.

Word choice and precision: choosing the most precise and appropriate word for the context, tightening vague or wordy phrasing, maintaining a consistent and appropriate tone, and correcting commonly confused words (their/there/they're, affect/effect, than/then) in a STAAR draft.

Navigating tech-enhanced items: practical strategies for answering technology-enhanced items on the computer, reading the instructions for how many responses are needed, using on-screen tools (highlighter, typing box, drag handles), avoiding partial-credit losses, and reviewing flagged items before submitting.

Pacing the assessment: budgeting time across the reading questions, the short constructed responses, and the extended constructed response essay, leaving time to plan and proofread the essay, and using strategies (flagging, not over-investing in one question) to finish the whole test.

Reading the task and rubrics: reading a constructed-response prompt precisely to identify what it asks (the mode, the source, the required moves), and using the SCR 2-point rubric and the ECR 5-point rubric to write deliberately toward what scorers reward.

The new technology-enhanced item types: what each redesigned STAAR item type is and how it works, multiselect, inline choice (drop-down), hot text, drag-and-drop, hot spot, and multipart, plus the short and extended constructed responses, and how scoring differs from a single multiple-choice point.

The redesigned online format: what the STAAR redesign changed for English I (online delivery, integrated reading and writing, multiple choice capped at 75 percent, cross-curricular passages), how the assessment is structured, when it is taken, and how it is scored into performance levels.

Analyzing argument and claims: identifying the central claim of an argumentative text, separating reasons and evidence from the claim, recognizing rhetorical appeals (logos, ethos, pathos), and evaluating whether the support is relevant and sufficient in a STAAR argumentative passage.

Author's purpose and craft: determining an author's purpose (to inform, persuade, or entertain) and point of view, and analyzing the craft choices, text structure, word choice, tone, and text features, that an author uses to achieve that purpose in a STAAR informational text.

Central ideas in informational texts: determining the central idea of an informational passage, distinguishing it from the topic and from supporting details, and tracing how details and text structure develop the central idea across a STAAR informational text.

Reading cross-curricular passages: approaching informational passages with topics drawn from science, social studies, or the arts, understanding that the questions assess reading skill rather than subject knowledge, and handling unfamiliar terminology, data, and graphics in a STAAR passage.

Synthesizing paired texts: reading two related texts as a set, comparing their central ideas, purposes, and perspectives, identifying where they agree, disagree, or add to one another, and answering cross-text questions on a STAAR paired passage.

Text evidence and inference: drawing inferences that an informational text supports, anchoring each inference to its textual trigger, selecting the evidence that best supports a given conclusion, and rejecting the over-reaching and unsupported inferences that STAAR distractors are built from.

Analyzing theme in literary texts: stating a theme as a complete sentence about life or human nature (not a topic word), distinguishing theme from subject and from moral, and tracing how a writer develops a theme through plot, character, and detail across a STAAR literary passage.

Character and characterization: distinguishing direct from indirect characterization, inferring traits and motivations from what a character says, does, and how others react, and tracking how and why a character changes across a STAAR literary passage.

Figurative language and literary devices: identifying metaphor, simile, personification, imagery, symbolism, and hyperbole, and analyzing the effect each device creates, the move from naming a device to explaining what it does in a STAAR literary text.

Plot and structure in fiction: identifying the stages of a plot (exposition, rising action, climax, resolution), recognizing how conflict drives a story, and analyzing how structural choices such as flashback, foreshadowing, and pacing shape meaning in a STAAR literary passage.

Reading drama on STAAR: understanding the conventions of dramatic text (dialogue, stage directions, acts and scenes), inferring character and conflict from dialogue and action without a narrator, and analyzing how stage directions shape meaning in a STAAR drama excerpt.

Reading poetry on STAAR: paraphrasing a poem to grasp its literal sense, identifying poetic structure (stanza, line break, rhyme, repetition) and figurative language, and analyzing how a poem's form and sound contribute to its meaning and tone.

Common short-response mistakes: the recurring errors that cost SCR points (no evidence, irrelevant evidence, not answering the question asked, retelling the plot, over-writing, and answering from outside the text), and the habit that prevents each.

Reading short constructed response types: the common SCR question types on STAAR reading (central idea, inference, character, author's craft, and cross-text comparison), and how the answer-plus-evidence structure adapts to each, including the paired-text SCR that needs evidence from both texts.

The answer plus evidence structure: the reliable two-part shape of a full-credit SCR, stating a direct answer to the question and supporting it with a specific quotation or paraphrase from the text, and adding a brief link where the evidence is not self-explanatory.

The SCR 2-point rubric: how the item-specific 2-point rubric works, what distinguishes a 2-point response (correct answer plus relevant evidence) from a 1-point response (one of those) and a 0, and how to use the rubric to secure both points.

Understanding the short constructed response: what an SCR is (a brief typed answer of a sentence or two), how it differs from the extended response and from multiple choice, when it appears in reading, and what the 2-point rubric expects.

Organizing and developing ideas: structuring the STAAR essay with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, using transitions to create logical progression, and developing each idea fully with reasons, evidence, and analysis rather than thin or repetitive points.

Refuting a counterargument: acknowledging the strongest opposing view, rebutting it with reasoning or text evidence so the controlling idea still stands, and understanding why identifying and refuting a counterargument is what lifts an argumentative ECR to the top of the Development of Ideas trait.

The ECR rubric and scoring: how the 5-point analytic rubric works (Development of Ideas 0 to 3, Use of Conventions 0 to 2), what each trait rewards, the rule that a 0 on ideas forces a 0 on conventions, and how to write toward the top score on each trait.

Understanding the extended constructed response: what the STAAR English I essay task asks (an evidence-based response to a reading passage or paired set), the modes it can take, how it differs from a standalone-prompt essay, and how the 5-point rubric shapes what to write.

Using text evidence in the essay: selecting specific and relevant evidence from the passage(s), embedding quotations and paraphrase smoothly, and following every piece of evidence with analysis that links it to the controlling idea, the point-evidence-explanation pattern.

Writing a controlling idea: crafting a clear thesis for the STAAR essay, a position for an argument or a main point for an informational response, stating it as a full sentence that the body can develop, and placing it so it controls the whole response.