Skip to main content
United StatesEnvironmental ScienceSyllabus dot point

How do food chains combine into food webs, and what happens when one species is removed?

Topic 1.11 Food Chains and Food Webs: describe how food chains and food webs represent the flow of energy and matter, and predict the effects of changes to a food web.

A focused answer to APES Topic 1.11, covering food chains and food webs, how energy and matter flow through them, keystone species, trophic cascades, and predicting the effects of removing a species, with a worked food-web disruption question.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Food chains and food webs
  3. Energy and matter in the web
  4. Keystone species
  5. Predicting the effects of change
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 1.11) wants you to describe how food chains and food webs represent the flow of energy and matter, and to predict the consequences of changes to a web, such as removing a species. The big ideas are that webs are interconnected, that some species (keystone species) matter far more than their numbers suggest, and that disturbances can ripple through the web as trophic cascades.

Food chains and food webs

A food web is more realistic than a single chain because most organisms eat, and are eaten by, several others. This interconnection gives ecosystems resilience but also means disturbances can spread.

Energy and matter in the web

Keystone species

Classic examples include the sea otter (which controls sea urchins and so protects kelp forests) and top predators such as wolves. Keystone species often hold a web together by controlling the populations beneath them.

Predicting the effects of change

Because a food web is interconnected, removing or adding a species sets off knock-on effects. When a top predator is removed, its prey can increase, and that increase then reduces the prey's own food source, an indirect effect known as a trophic cascade. The classic kelp-forest example runs: remove sea otters, sea urchins boom, urchins overgraze the kelp, and the kelp forest collapses, taking with it the many species that depended on it. Cascades can also work the other way, with the return of a predator restoring a community. This predictive reasoning is exactly what the exam asks for: trace the arrows, decide which populations rise and which fall, and follow the effect through the web. It is also the bridge from Unit 1 to Unit 2, because the loss of a keystone species is one of the most powerful ways biodiversity, and the ecosystem services that depend on it, can be lost.

Try this

Q1. Describe one advantage of a food web over a food chain for representing an ecosystem. [1 point]

  • Cue. A food web shows the many interconnected feeding relationships, which is more realistic than a single linear chain because most organisms have several food sources and predators.

Q2. Explain why losing a keystone species can transform an ecosystem. [2 points]

  • Cue. A keystone species has effects far larger than its abundance; removing it (for example a top predator) lets its prey boom and triggers a cascade that changes populations throughout the web.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2022 (style)4 marksSection II (FRQ). A food web includes sea otters, sea urchins and kelp. Sea otters eat sea urchins, and sea urchins eat kelp. (a) Describe the difference between a food chain and a food web. (b) Predict what happens to the sea urchin and kelp populations if sea otters are removed. (c) Explain why the sea otter can be considered a keystone species. (d) Define a trophic cascade using this example.
Show worked answer →

A 4-point FRQ on food-web dynamics.

(a) Describe (1 point): a food chain is a single linear pathway of energy from one organism to the next; a food web is the network of many interconnected food chains showing all the feeding relationships in a community.
(b) Predict (1 point): without otters, sea urchins increase (no longer eaten), and the larger urchin population overgrazes the kelp, so kelp declines or disappears.
(c) Explain (1 point): the sea otter is a keystone species because its presence has a large effect on the whole community relative to its abundance, controlling urchins and so allowing the kelp forest and the species that depend on it to persist.
(d) Define (1 point): a trophic cascade is a chain of indirect effects passing down the food web when a top predator is changed, here otters affecting urchins affecting kelp.

Markers reward the chain-versus-web distinction, the urchin-up and kelp-down prediction, the keystone definition applied to otters, and a correct trophic-cascade definition.

AP 2020 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). The removal of a top predator causes its prey to increase and the prey's food source to decrease. This series of indirect effects is best described as (A) resource partitioning (B) a trophic cascade (C) primary succession (D) eutrophication. Justify your choice.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point MCQ on food-web effects. The answer is (B).

A trophic cascade is a chain of indirect effects that ripples through trophic levels when a predator (or other key species) is changed. Resource partitioning (A) is how competitors divide resources; primary succession (C) is colonization of bare ground; eutrophication (D) is nutrient enrichment of water. The trap is confusing a trophic cascade with a direct predator-prey effect; the cascade includes the indirect knock-on effect further down the web.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this