How did conflict between crown and Parliament in England produce a constitutional monarchy rather than an absolutist one?
Topic 3.2 The English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution: the struggle between king and Parliament, the execution of Charles I, the Restoration, and the Glorious Revolution that established parliamentary supremacy.
A focused answer to AP European History Topic 3.2, tracing the English Civil War, the execution of Charles I, the Restoration, and the Glorious Revolution of 1688 to 1689, and explaining how England developed constitutionalism (parliamentary supremacy) rather than the absolutism rising on the continent.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this topic is asking
Topic 3.2 asks you to explain how England, unlike France, ended up with a constitutional monarchy rather than an absolutist one. The College Board wants the story of the struggle between crown and Parliament: the English Civil War, the execution of Charles I, the Restoration, and the Glorious Revolution of 1688 to 1689 that established parliamentary supremacy.
The road to civil war
The conflict was rooted in a clash over sovereignty. England's kings, especially Charles I, claimed broad royal authority and tried to rule and tax without summoning Parliament. Parliament insisted on its established right to control taxation and protect the law. Religious tension sharpened the dispute, as many in Parliament suspected the crown of favoring Catholic-leaning practices. When Charles needed money for war, the standoff became a fight, and the English Civil War broke out in 1642.
Civil war, regicide, and republic
Restoration and renewed crisis
In 1660 the monarchy was restored under Charles II, with an uneasy balance between crown and Parliament. The crisis returned under his brother James II, an openly Catholic king whose attempts to advance Catholics and rule by prerogative alarmed the Protestant political nation. The birth of a Catholic heir raised the prospect of a permanent Catholic dynasty, and Parliament acted.
The Glorious Revolution
Why it mattered
The English settlement created the leading European model of limited, parliamentary government and a powerful counter-example to absolutism. It influenced political thinkers, above all John Locke, whose ideas about government by consent (examined in Unit 4) drew on these events, and it set up the contrast at the heart of Topic 3.8.
Try this
Q1. What did the English Bill of Rights of 1689 establish? [Recall]
- Cue. Parliamentary supremacy: the monarch could not tax, keep a standing army, or suspend laws without Parliament's consent, making sovereignty shared between crown and Parliament.
Q2. Explain why the execution of Charles I was so significant. [Short explanation]
- Cue. It was the first time a reigning English king was tried and put to death by his own subjects, a direct rejection of the divine right of kings and a dramatic assertion that the monarch was not above the law.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
AP 2018 (style)3 marksBriefly describe ONE cause of the English Civil War. Briefly explain ONE result of the Glorious Revolution. Briefly explain ONE way England's political development differed from France's in this period.Show worked answer →
A Short Answer Question (SAQ), 3 points, one per task.
A. Cause: the conflict between Charles I, who claimed broad royal authority and ruled without Parliament, and a Parliament that insisted on its right to control taxation and law.
B. Result of the Glorious Revolution: the English Bill of Rights established parliamentary supremacy, limiting the monarch and confirming Parliament's control of taxation and law.
C. Difference from France: England developed constitutionalism, with sovereignty shared between crown and Parliament, while France under Louis XIV developed absolutism with sovereignty in the monarch.
Markers want a cause, a result, and a clean contrast with France.
AP 2022 (style)6 marksEvaluate the most important reason England developed a constitutional monarchy rather than an absolutist one in the period c. 1640 to c. 1689.Show worked answer →
A Long Essay Question (LEQ), scored on the 6-point causation rubric.
Thesis (1): "England developed constitutionalism mainly because Parliament's established control over taxation gave it the leverage to resist royal claims, a leverage confirmed by the Civil War and locked in by the Glorious Revolution."
Contextualization (1): the broad trend toward centralized power and the rival absolutist model on the continent.
Evidence (2): Charles I's clashes with Parliament and his execution; the Restoration; the deposition of James II and the Bill of Rights of 1689.
Analysis (2): rank Parliament's fiscal power as the decisive cause while showing how religious fears (a Catholic heir) and the bloodless invitation to William and Mary reinforced it, then add complexity by contrasting the French outcome.
Related dot points
- Topic 3.1 Contextualizing State Building, Expansion, and Conflict: the conditions after the wars of religion that drove rulers to centralize power and that produced rival absolutist and constitutional states.
A focused answer to AP European History Topic 3.1, setting the scene for Unit 3: the exhaustion left by the wars of religion, the Peace of Westphalia and the sovereign state, the military revolution and the fiscal-military state, and how these conditions produced the rival models of absolutism and constitutionalism.
- Topic 3.7 Absolutist Approaches to Power: the theory and practice of absolutism, the reign of Louis XIV, the rise of absolutism in central and eastern Europe, and the tools rulers used to centralize power.
A focused answer to AP European History Topic 3.7, covering the theory and practice of absolutism: divine-right monarchy, Louis XIV and Versailles, the absolutism of Prussia under the Hohenzollerns and Russia under Peter the Great, and the tools (standing armies, bureaucracy, taming the nobility) used to centralize power.
- Topic 3.8 Comparison in the Age of Absolutism and Constitutionalism: applying the historical reasoning skill of comparison to the two models of state power that emerged after 1648.
A focused answer to AP European History Topic 3.8, the comparison reasoning skill applied to Unit 3: comparing absolutism (France, Russia) with constitutionalism (England, the Dutch Republic), explaining their similarities and differences, and structuring a comparison LEQ or DBQ that explains the reasons for both.
- Topic 3.5 The Dutch Golden Age: the rise of the Dutch Republic as a commercial, financial, and cultural power, its republican constitutionalism, and the financial innovations that made it dominant.
A focused answer to AP European History Topic 3.5, covering the rise of the Dutch Republic in the 17th century: its commercial and financial dominance (the VOC, the Amsterdam exchange, the fluyt), its republican constitutionalism and religious toleration, and its golden age of art and learning.
- Topic 4.3 The Enlightenment: the philosophes and their ideas on government, rights, religion, and the economy, from Locke and Montesquieu to Rousseau, Voltaire, and Smith.
A focused answer to AP European History Topic 4.3, covering the Enlightenment: the philosophes and their core ideas (natural rights and social contract in Locke and Rousseau, separation of powers in Montesquieu, toleration in Voltaire, free markets in Smith), and how applying reason to society challenged traditional authority.
Sources & how we know this
- AP European History Course and Exam Description — College Board (2020)