Skip to main content
United StatesEuropean HistorySyllabus dot point

What was 19th-century nationalism, and why did it become so powerful?

Topic 7.2 Nationalism: the idea of the nation, its romantic and liberal roots, and how it became the dominant political force of the 19th century, uniting some peoples and dividing others.

A focused answer to AP European History Topic 7.2, on 19th-century nationalism: the idea that peoples sharing a language, culture, and history should form their own nation-state, its romantic and liberal roots, and how it both unified peoples (Italy, Germany) and threatened the multinational empires.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. What nationalism means
  3. The roots of nationalism
  4. The power to unite
  5. The power to divide
  6. Why it mattered
  7. Try this

What this topic is asking

Topic 7.2 asks you to explain nationalism: what the idea of the nation meant, where it came from, and how it became the dominant political force of the 19th century. The College Board wants you to see nationalism's romantic and liberal roots and its double power to unite some peoples and divide others.

What nationalism means

The roots of nationalism

The power to unite

The power to divide

But nationalism cut both ways.

Why it mattered

Nationalism is the master theme of Unit 7 and one of the most consequential forces in modern history. It built the great nation-states of Italy and Germany (Topic 7.3), destabilized the multinational empires, justified the New Imperialism, and, in its racial forms, paved the way for the catastrophes of the 20th century. Understanding nationalism, its roots, its power to unite and divide, and its shifting character, is essential to the politics of the whole later course.

Try this

Q1. Define nationalism in one sentence. [Recall]

  • Cue. The belief that a people sharing a common language, culture, and history should govern itself in its own nation-state, above older loyalties to dynasty, region, or religion.

Q2. Explain how nationalism could both unite and divide 19th-century Europe. [Short explanation]

  • Cue. It united peoples into new nation-states (Italy, Germany) but also drove the many peoples of the multinational empires to demand self-rule, threatening to tear Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman, and the Russian empires apart.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2018 (style)3 marksBriefly describe ONE belief of 19th-century nationalism. Briefly explain ONE root of nationalism. Briefly explain ONE way nationalism could divide as well as unite.
Show worked answer →

A Short Answer Question (SAQ), 3 points, one per task.

A. Describe: that a people sharing language, culture, and history should govern itself in its own nation-state.

B. Root: the French Revolution's idea of the sovereign nation, and Romanticism's celebration of the unique spirit and past of each people.

C. How it divided: the many peoples of the multinational empires demanded self-rule, threatening to break those empires apart.

Markers want a belief, a root, and the divisive side of nationalism.

AP 2021 (style)6 marksEvaluate the extent to which nationalism was the most powerful political force in 19th-century Europe.
Show worked answer →

A Long Essay Question (LEQ), scored on the 6-point argumentation rubric.

Thesis (1): "Nationalism was the most powerful political force of the 19th century, remaking the map through unification and threatening the multinational empires, though it worked alongside liberalism, industrialization, and Realpolitik."

Contextualization (1): the legacy of the French Revolution and the ideologies of Unit 6.

Evidence (2): the unification of Italy and Germany; nationalist strains in Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman lands; the romantic and liberal roots of national feeling.

Analysis (2): argue nationalism was central while showing how it combined with other forces, then add complexity by noting its double power to unite and to divide.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this