Skip to main content
United StatesPhysics C: MechanicsSyllabus dot point

What is rotational inertia, and how do we compute it by summation, by integration for continuous bodies, and by the parallel-axis theorem?

Topic 5.4 Rotational Inertia: define rotational inertia as the mass-weighted sum of r2r^2, compute it by integration for continuous bodies, and apply the parallel-axis theorem.

A focused answer to AP Physics C: Mechanics Topic 5.4, covering rotational inertia (moment of inertia) as the sum of mr2mr^2, computing it by integration for rods, hoops, disks and spheres, the dependence on the axis and mass distribution, and the parallel-axis theorem, with calculus-based worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Defining rotational inertia
  3. Computing II by integration
  4. The parallel-axis theorem
  5. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 5.4) wants you to define rotational inertia (the moment of inertia) as the mass-weighted sum of r2r^2, to compute it by integration for continuous bodies, and to apply the parallel-axis theorem. Rotational inertia is the rotational analogue of mass: it measures resistance to angular acceleration, and unlike mass it depends on the axis and how the mass is distributed. The calculus derivations are a signature AP Physics C skill.

Defining rotational inertia

Rotational inertia plays the role of mass in rotational dynamics: the larger it is, the harder it is to angularly accelerate the body, just as a larger mass resists linear acceleration. The crucial difference is the r2r^2 weighting: a mass element far from the axis contributes much more than one near it. Consequently II depends not only on the total mass but on how that mass is distributed and on which axis you rotate about. The same object has different rotational inertias about different axes.

Computing II by integration

For a continuous body, the sum becomes an integral over the mass elements:

I=r2dm.I = \int r^2\,dm.

You express dmdm through the density and geometry, dm=λdxdm = \lambda\,dx for a rod, dm=σdAdm = \sigma\,dA for a plate, dm=ρdVdm = \rho\,dV for a solid, and integrate r2r^2 over the body. For a uniform rod of mass MM, length LL, about its center, I=L/2L/2x2MLdx=112ML2I = \int_{-L/2}^{L/2}x^2\dfrac{M}{L}\,dx = \tfrac{1}{12}ML^2; about one end it is 13ML2\tfrac{1}{3}ML^2. A hoop has all its mass at radius RR, so I=MR2I = MR^2; a solid disk integrates to 12MR2\tfrac{1}{2}MR^2; a solid sphere to 25MR2\tfrac{2}{5}MR^2. These derivations, and reading the right standard result off the equation sheet, are routinely examined.

The parallel-axis theorem

Once you know the rotational inertia IcmI_{cm} about an axis through the center of mass, the parallel-axis theorem gives it about any parallel axis a distance dd away:

I=Icm+Md2.I = I_{cm} + Md^2.

This saves you from re-integrating for a shifted axis. For example, a rod about its center has Icm=112ML2I_{cm} = \tfrac{1}{12}ML^2; about an end (a distance L/2L/2 away) it is 112ML2+M(L/2)2=13ML2\tfrac{1}{12}ML^2 + M(L/2)^2 = \tfrac{1}{3}ML^2, matching the direct integral. The theorem also shows that the rotational inertia is smallest about an axis through the center of mass and grows as you move the axis away.

Try this

Q1. A solid disk of mass 4.04.0 kg and radius 0.200.20 m rotates about its central axis. Calculate its rotational inertia. [2 points]

  • Cue. I=12MR2=12(4.0)(0.20)2=0.080I = \tfrac{1}{2}MR^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}(4.0)(0.20)^2 = 0.080 kg m squared.

Q2. A rod has Icm=112ML2I_{cm} = \tfrac{1}{12}ML^2. State its rotational inertia about an axis through one end. [2 points]

  • Cue. Parallel axis with d=L/2d = L/2: I=112ML2+M(L/2)2=13ML2I = \tfrac{1}{12}ML^2 + M(L/2)^2 = \tfrac{1}{3}ML^2.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2024 (style)6 marksSection II (FRQ, calculus). A uniform thin rod has mass MM and length LL. (a) Derive the rotational inertia about an axis through one end, perpendicular to the rod, by integration. (b) Derive it about an axis through the center, perpendicular to the rod. (c) Verify that the two results are consistent with the parallel-axis theorem.
Show worked answer →

A 6-point calculus FRQ deriving moments of inertia.

(a) About one end (2 points): with λ=M/L\lambda = M/L and dm=λdxdm = \lambda\,dx, Iend=0Lx2dm=λ0Lx2dx=λL33=MLL33=13ML2I_{end} = \int_0^L x^2\,dm = \lambda\int_0^L x^2\,dx = \lambda\dfrac{L^3}{3} = \dfrac{M}{L}\dfrac{L^3}{3} = \tfrac{1}{3}ML^2.
(b) About the center (2 points): Icm=L/2L/2x2λdx=λ2(L/2)33=λL312=112ML2I_{cm} = \int_{-L/2}^{L/2} x^2\,\lambda\,dx = \lambda\dfrac{2(L/2)^3}{3} = \lambda\dfrac{L^3}{12} = \tfrac{1}{12}ML^2.
(c) Parallel-axis check (2 points): the center is a distance d=L/2d = L/2 from the end, so Iend=Icm+Md2=112ML2+M(L/2)2=112ML2+14ML2=13ML2I_{end} = I_{cm} + Md^2 = \tfrac{1}{12}ML^2 + M(L/2)^2 = \tfrac{1}{12}ML^2 + \tfrac{1}{4}ML^2 = \tfrac{1}{3}ML^2. Consistent.

Markers reward setting up x2dm\int x^2\,dm with correct limits and confirming the parallel-axis theorem.

AP 2021 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). A solid disk and a thin hoop have the same mass and radius. About their central axes, which has the larger rotational inertia? (A) the disk (B) the hoop (C) they are equal (D) it depends on the material. Justify your reasoning.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point conceptual MCQ. The answer is (B).

Rotational inertia depends on how far the mass lies from the axis (I=mr2I = \sum mr^2). The hoop has all its mass at the rim (radius RR), giving I=MR2I = MR^2, while the disk spreads mass from the center outward, giving I=12MR2I = \tfrac{1}{2}MR^2. The hoop's mass is farther out on average, so its rotational inertia is larger. The trap is to think equal mass and radius means equal II; the distribution matters.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this