Skip to main content
United StatesPhysicsSyllabus dot point

What determines the gravitational force between two masses, and how does this relate to weight and the gravitational field near a planet?

Topic 2.6 Gravitational Force: use Newton's law of universal gravitation to find the force between masses, and relate this to weight and the gravitational field strength near a planet's surface.

A focused answer to AP Physics 1 Topic 2.6, covering Newton's law of universal gravitation, the inverse-square dependence on distance, gravitational field strength, the distinction between mass and weight, and how g arises near a planet, with full worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Newton's law of universal gravitation
  3. The inverse-square law
  4. Gravitational field strength and weight
  5. Why mass and weight must be kept apart
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 2.6) wants you to use Newton's law of universal gravitation to find the attractive force between two masses, to understand its inverse-square dependence on distance, and to relate gravity to weight and the gravitational field strength gg near a planet. A central exam theme is the difference between mass (which never changes) and weight (which depends on where you are).

Newton's law of universal gravitation

Gravity is always attractive and always acts between every pair of masses, though it is only noticeable when at least one mass is astronomically large. The forces on the two masses form a Newton's-third-law pair: equal in magnitude, opposite in direction, regardless of how different the masses are.

The inverse-square law

The inverse-square behavior is why gravity weakens rapidly with altitude in astronomical terms but is nearly constant over the few kilometers near a planet's surface (the change in rr is tiny compared with the planet's radius). This is what lets us treat gg as constant in everyday projectile and free-fall problems.

Gravitational field strength and weight

The gravitational field strength gg at a location is the gravitational force per unit mass placed there:

g=Fm=GMr2g = \frac{F}{m} = \frac{GM}{r^2}

where MM is the mass of the planet (or star) and rr the distance from its center. Near Earth's surface, g≈9.8g \approx 9.8 N/kg. The weight of an object is then the gravitational force on it:

W=mgW = mg

Notice that gg here is the same quantity as the free-fall acceleration 9.89.8 m/s squared from kinematics: an object in free fall has only its weight acting on it, so Fnet=mg=maF_{net} = mg = ma gives a=ga = g. The units N/kg and m/s squared are equivalent.

Why mass and weight must be kept apart

The exam returns again and again to the distinction between mass and weight, because the two are easy to conflate in everyday speech but physically different. Mass is the amount of matter, a measure of inertia, fixed in kilograms no matter where the object is; it is the mm in F=maF = ma. Weight is the gravitational force on that mass, W=mgW = mg, measured in newtons, and it changes with the local field strength. An astronaut who weighs about 590590 N on Earth weighs only about 9898 N on the Moon (where g≈1.6g \approx 1.6 N/kg), yet has exactly the same 6060 kg mass in both places, and so the same resistance to being pushed. "Weightlessness" in orbit is not the absence of gravity (gravity is what holds the orbit) but free fall, in which there is no supporting normal force to give the sensation of weight. Keeping mass as the inertia term and weight as a force lets you put weight correctly on a free-body diagram (always mgmg downward toward the planet's center) and reserve mass for the Fnet=maF_{net} = ma step.

Try this

Q1. Calculate the weight of a 7575 kg person on Earth (g=9.8g = 9.8 N/kg). [2 points]

  • Cue. W=mg=(75)(9.8)=735W = mg = (75)(9.8) = 735 N downward.

Q2. State what happens to the gravitational force between two masses if one mass is tripled (distance unchanged). [1 point]

  • Cue. The force triples, since FF is proportional to each mass.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2024 (style)4 marksSection II (short FRQ, quantitative). A planet has twice the mass of Earth and the same radius. Take Earth's surface gravitational field strength as 9.89.8 N/kg. (a) Calculate the gravitational field strength at the surface of this planet. (b) A 6060 kg astronaut stands on the planet. Calculate the astronaut's weight there. (c) Explain why the astronaut's mass is the same on the planet as on Earth.
Show worked answer →

A 4-point FRQ on gravitational field strength and the mass-weight distinction.

(a) Field strength (2 points): g=GMr2g = \dfrac{GM}{r^2}. With the same radius and twice the mass, gg doubles: g=2×9.8=19.6g = 2 \times 9.8 = 19.6 N/kg.
(b) Weight (1 point): W=mg=(60)(19.6)=1176W = mg = (60)(19.6) = 1176 N (about 1.2×1031.2 \times 10^3 N).
(c) Explain (1 point): mass measures the amount of matter (inertia) and does not depend on location; weight is the gravitational force, which depends on the local field strength. Moving to a stronger field changes the weight but not the mass.

Markers reward the proportionality of gg to mass, the correct weight, and a clear mass-versus-weight explanation.

AP 2022 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). If the distance between two masses is doubled, the gravitational force between them becomes... (A) twice as large (B) half as large (C) one quarter as large (D) four times as large. Justify your reasoning.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point MCQ on the inverse-square law. The answer is (C).

Newton's law of universal gravitation gives F=Gm1m2r2F = \dfrac{Gm_1 m_2}{r^2}, so the force is inversely proportional to the square of the separation. Doubling rr multiplies r2r^2 by four, reducing the force to one quarter. The trap is treating the relationship as inverse-linear (halving) rather than inverse-square (quartering).

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this