Skip to main content
United StatesPoliticsSyllabus dot point

How do elections, redistricting, partisanship, and divided government shape the way members of Congress behave and the policies Congress produces?

Topic 2.3 Congressional Behavior: explain how congressional behavior is influenced and constrained by election processes, partisanship, and divided government.

A focused answer to AP US Government Topic 2.3: how elections, gerrymandering, the trustee and delegate models, partisanship, divided government, and gridlock shape the behavior of members of Congress and the policies they produce.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Elections and redistricting
  3. How members decide their votes
  4. Partisanship, divided government, and gridlock
  5. Why this matters for the exam
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

Topic 2.3 explains why members of Congress act the way they do. The College Board wants you to see how outside pressures, elections, redistricting, partisanship, and divided government, shape and constrain congressional behavior, often producing gridlock. This is the "politics" half of Congress, complementing the structure of Topics 2.1 and 2.2.

Elections and redistricting

Members of Congress are, above all, focused on re-election, which shapes their behavior.

How members decide their votes

The exam tests three models of representation:

  • Trustee model. The member uses their own judgement about the national interest, even against constituents' immediate wishes. Federalist No. 10's idea that representatives "refine and enlarge" public views supports this.
  • Delegate model. The member votes the way their constituents want, acting as their mouthpiece. This reflects popular sovereignty most directly.
  • Politico model. The member blends the two, acting as a delegate on issues constituents care about and a trustee on technical or distant ones.

Partisanship, divided government, and gridlock

These dynamics explain why Congress's approval ratings are often low even as individual members are re-elected: voters dislike the institution's gridlock but like their own responsive representative.

Why this matters for the exam

Topic 2.3 is a favorite for Concept Application (a gerrymandering or divided-government scenario) and Argument Essays (trustee versus delegate). It also connects to data on polarization in the Quantitative Analysis FRQ.

Try this

Q1. Define gerrymandering. [Recall]

  • Cue. Drawing district boundaries to favor one party or group, using tactics like packing and cracking.

Q2. Explain how a safe seat affects a member's behavior. [Short explanation]

  • Cue. With little general-election threat, the member fears a primary challenge from their party's ideological wing, pushing them toward more partisan positions.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2018 (style)3 marksA state legislature redraws its congressional district lines so that one party is likely to win far more seats than its share of the statewide vote. A. Identify the practice described. B. Explain how this practice can affect the behavior of the members elected from those districts. C. Explain one way the practice can be challenged.
Show worked answer →

A Concept Application FRQ, 3 points (A, B, C).

A. Identify: gerrymandering (partisan redistricting).

B. Explain behavior: members from safe, lopsided districts face little general-election threat, so they may behave more ideologically and fear primary challengers more than the broad electorate, increasing partisanship.

C. Explain a challenge: courts can strike down racial gerrymanders (as in Shaw v. Reno), or reformers can use independent redistricting commissions.

Markers reward naming the practice and linking it to a real behavioral consequence.

AP 2022 (style)6 marksDevelop an argument about whether members of Congress should act as trustees or as delegates when voting on legislation. Use at least one piece of evidence from one of the following: the Constitution of the United States or Federalist No. 10. Provide a defensible thesis, evidence and reasoning, and a response to an opposing perspective.
Show worked answer →

An Argument Essay FRQ, 6-point rubric.

Thesis (1): e.g. "Members should generally act as trustees, using their judgement for the national interest, because the framers designed a republic, not a direct democracy."

Evidence (up to 3): the republican design of Article I; Federalist No. 10 on representatives refining the public view; the representative structure of Congress.

Reasoning (1): explain how trustee behavior serves the long-term and national interest.

Alternative perspective (1): concede that the delegate model better reflects popular sovereignty, then argue judgement is needed for complex policy.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this