Skip to main content
United StatesPoliticsSyllabus dot point

How do the formal and informal powers of the president, as set out in Article II and developed over time, enable the executive to influence policy?

Topic 2.4 Roles and Powers of the President: explain how the president can implement a policy agenda.

A focused answer to AP US Government Topic 2.4: the formal (Article II) and informal powers of the president, including the veto, commander-in-chief, appointments, treaties, executive orders, and how a president implements a policy agenda.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Formal powers from Article II
  3. Informal powers that have grown over time
  4. How a president implements an agenda
  5. Why this matters for the exam
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

Topic 2.4 introduces the presidency and how a president actually advances a policy agenda. The College Board distinguishes the formal powers written into Article II from the informal powers presidents have developed in practice. Knowing which is which, and how each lets a president govern, is the core of this topic.

Formal powers from Article II

The most important formal lever in the policy process is the veto: the president can reject a bill passed by Congress, and overriding the veto requires a two-thirds vote in both chambers, which is hard to muster. Even the threat of a veto shapes what Congress passes.

Informal powers that have grown over time

How a president implements an agenda

Putting the powers together, a president advances policy by:

  • Working with Congress where possible, using the veto threat and persuasion to shape legislation.
  • Acting alone through the bureaucracy when Congress will not move, via executive orders and directives to agencies.
  • Shaping the courts through judicial nominations that outlast the president's term.
  • Mobilizing public opinion through the bully pulpit and direct communication.

The trade-off is that informal, unilateral actions are also the least durable: an executive order can be undone by the next president, struck down by a court, or undercut by Congress.

Why this matters for the exam

Topic 2.4 is heavily tested in Concept Application (a president acting around Congress) and Argument Essays on whether presidential power has grown too large. The formal-versus-informal distinction is the key analytic move.

Try this

Q1. Name three formal powers of the president. [Recall]

  • Cue. The veto, commander-in-chief, and the power to nominate judges and officials (also treaties and pardons).

Q2. Explain why a president might prefer an executive order to legislation. [Short explanation]

  • Cue. An executive order lets the president act unilaterally through the bureaucracy without congressional approval, useful when Congress is divided or uncooperative.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2019 (style)3 marksA president, unable to pass a bill through a divided Congress, issues an executive order directing federal agencies to change how they enforce an existing law. A. Identify whether the action described is a formal or informal power. B. Explain why a president might use this power instead of seeking legislation. C. Explain one limit on this power.
Show worked answer →

A Concept Application FRQ, 3 points (A, B, C).

A. Identify: an informal power (executive orders are not listed in Article II but derive from the president's duty to execute the laws).

B. Explain the why: facing a divided or uncooperative Congress, a president can act unilaterally through the bureaucracy to advance the agenda without passing a law.

C. Explain a limit: a later president can reverse the order, Congress can pass a contrary law or cut funding, and courts can strike it down if it exceeds executive authority.

Markers reward correctly classifying the power and naming a real limit.

AP 2021 (style)6 marksDevelop an argument about whether the president's informal powers have become more important than the formal powers granted in Article II. Use at least one piece of evidence from one of the following: the Constitution of the United States or Federalist No. 70. Provide a defensible thesis, evidence and reasoning, and a response to an opposing perspective.
Show worked answer →

An Argument Essay FRQ, 6-point rubric. (Federalist No. 70 defends a single energetic executive.)

Thesis (1): e.g. "Informal powers have become more important, because executive orders and the bully pulpit let presidents act when a polarized Congress will not legislate."

Evidence (up to 3): the veto and appointment powers in Article II; Federalist No. 70 on energy in the executive; the modern use of executive orders.

Reasoning (1): explain how informal tools let presidents lead amid gridlock.

Alternative perspective (1): concede that formal powers like the veto and appointments remain decisive, then argue informal powers fill the gaps.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this