Skip to main content
United StatesPoliticsSyllabus dot point

How does the principle of judicial review, established in Marbury v. Madison and defended in Federalist No. 78, give the courts the power to check the other branches?

Topic 2.8 The Judicial Branch: explain the principle of judicial review and how it checks the power of other institutions and state governments.

A focused answer to AP US Government Topic 2.8: the structure of the federal judiciary under Article III, the principle of judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison, and the argument of Federalist No. 78 for an independent judiciary.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The structure of the judiciary
  3. Judicial review and Marbury v. Madison
  4. Federalist No. 78 and the case for an independent judiciary
  5. Why this matters for the exam
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

Topic 2.8 introduces the judicial branch and its defining power: judicial review. The College Board pairs this topic with two required documents, the required case Marbury v. Madison and the foundational document Federalist No. 78. You must explain how an unelected court can check Congress, the president, and the states.

The structure of the judiciary

The federal court system has three levels: district (trial) courts, circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court at the top. Independence, through life tenure and protected pay, is what lets judges rule against powerful elected officials.

Judicial review and Marbury v. Madison

Federalist No. 78 and the case for an independent judiciary

Why this matters for the exam

Topic 2.8 is densely tested because it contains a required case (Marbury) and a required document (Federalist No. 78), both prime material for the SCOTUS Comparison FRQ and Argument Essays on judicial power.

Try this

Q1. Name the case that established judicial review. [Recall]

  • Cue. Marbury v. Madison (1803).

Q2. Explain why Federalist No. 78 calls the judiciary the least dangerous branch. [Short explanation]

  • Cue. The courts control neither the purse nor the sword, so they have judgement but no power to enforce their rulings on their own.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2019 (style)4 marksMarbury v. Madison (1803) is a required Supreme Court case. A. Identify the power the Supreme Court established for itself in Marbury v. Madison. B. Explain how Federalist No. 78 anticipated this role for the judiciary. C. Explain how this power allows the Court to check another branch.
Show worked answer →

A SCOTUS Comparison or analysis FRQ on a required case (4 points).

A. Identify: judicial review, the power to declare an act of Congress (or the executive) unconstitutional and void.

B. Explain Federalist No. 78: Hamilton argued the judiciary would interpret the law and treat the Constitution as superior to ordinary statutes, the logic behind judicial review.

C. Explain the check: by striking down a law as unconstitutional, the Court limits Congress; by voiding executive actions, it limits the president.

Markers reward correctly stating that Marbury established judicial review and tying it to Federalist No. 78.

AP 2021 (style)6 marksDevelop an argument about whether judicial review makes the courts too powerful relative to the elected branches. Use at least one piece of evidence from one of the following: the Constitution of the United States or Federalist No. 78. Provide a defensible thesis, evidence and reasoning, and a response to an opposing perspective.
Show worked answer →

An Argument Essay FRQ, 6-point rubric.

Thesis (1): e.g. "Judicial review does not make the courts too powerful, because the judiciary depends on the other branches to enforce its rulings and can be checked by appointments and amendments."

Evidence (up to 3): Article III's judicial power; Federalist No. 78 calling the judiciary the "least dangerous" branch; the appointment and confirmation process.

Reasoning (1): explain how the Court's lack of enforcement power limits it.

Alternative perspective (1): concede that striking down laws overrides elected majorities, then argue the courts remain dependent and checkable.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this