How do you read the command words and task directions precisely so you do exactly what each part asks?
Command words and task directions: reading the key command words on the Regents (identify, analyze, develop, distinguish) and decoding the bulleted task directions for Parts 2 and 3, so each response does exactly what is asked rather than a nearby task.
How to read the command words and task directions on the Regents: what identify, analyze, develop, and distinguish ask for, and how to decode the bulleted directions for the Part 2 argument and Part 3 response, so each answer does exactly what is asked.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this skill is asking
The Regents ELA tasks are written precisely, and doing exactly what they ask (no more, no less) is its own skill. The command words (identify, analyze, develop, distinguish) name the action required, and the bulleted directions for Parts 2 and 3 list separate scored requirements. Misreading a command word, or skipping a bullet, means answering a nearby task that scores less. This page covers the key command words and how to decode the task directions as a checklist. The transferable skill is treating the task wording as an instruction set: every word is there for a reason.
The key command words
A few command words carry most of the weight.
The most consequential distinction is between identify and analyze, which sit side by side in the Part 3 task ("identify a central idea and analyze how one writing strategy develops it"). Identifying is naming; analyzing is explaining how. A response that identifies a strategy but does not analyze it has done the easier half and stopped short of the marks. Reading the command word tells you which action is required at each point.
The directions are a checklist
For the two essays, the directions are bulleted, and the bullets matter.
This is why glancing at the prompt and writing from memory is risky: the bullets contain the exact requirements that the rubric rewards, and a student who half-remembers the task often misses one. A few seconds spent reading every bullet protects against losing a whole scored expectation.
Decoding a task
Try this
Q1. What is the difference between "identify" and "analyze" on the Regents? [Recall]
- Cue. Identify asks you to name or point to something; analyze asks you to explain how it works or achieves an effect. The Part 3 task asks for both: identify a central idea and analyze how a strategy develops it.
Q2. Why should you read the Part 2 directions as a checklist rather than skim them? [Short explanation]
- Cue. Each bullet (claim, counterclaim, three texts, citation, organization, formal style) is a scored requirement that maps to the rubric; skipping one means losing a scored expectation, so the bullets are the task, not preamble.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of NYSED exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Regents ELA (strategy)4 marksExam strategy. Match each command word to what it asks you to do: identify, analyze, develop, distinguish. (Knowledge of command words; rescoped to a 4-mark task.)Show worked answer →
The matches: "identify" asks you to name or point to something (a central idea, a strategy, a source); "analyze" asks you to explain how something works or achieves an effect (how a strategy develops an idea); "develop" asks you to build something out with reasoning and evidence (develop a claim, develop an argument); "distinguish" asks you to set one thing apart from another (distinguish your claim from opposing claims).
Markers reward answers that do the action the command word names. On the Regents these words are precise: the Part 3 task says identify a central idea and analyze a strategy, so naming a strategy without analyzing it does only half the task. Reading the command word tells you the action required.
Regents ELA (strategy)4 marksExam strategy. The Part 2 directions are a list of bullet points. Explain why reading every bullet matters and what is lost by skipping one. (Rescoped to a 4-mark conceptual question.)Show worked answer →
The Part 2 directions list separate requirements as bullets: establish a claim, distinguish it from opposing claims, use evidence from at least three texts, identify each source by text number, organize coherently, and use a formal style. Each bullet maps to a scored expectation on the rubric.
Skipping a bullet means skipping a scored requirement: ignore "distinguish your claim from opposing claims" and you lose the counterclaim analysis that lifts Content and Analysis; ignore "at least three texts" and you cap Command of Evidence. Markers reward a response that satisfies every bullet, so reading the directions as a checklist is part of the task, not preamble to skim.
Related dot points
- The three-part exam format: the structure of the whole Regents ELA exam (Part 1 Reading Comprehension, Part 2 Source-Based Argument, Part 3 Text-Analysis Response), how the raw points combine, and how the total converts to a scaled score out of 100 with 65 to pass.
The shape of the whole Regents ELA exam: Part 1 Reading Comprehension (24 multiple choice), Part 2 the Source-Based Argument (out of 6), and Part 3 the Text-Analysis Response (out of 4), how the raw points combine, and how the total converts to a scaled score out of 100 with 65 to pass.
- Timing and pacing the exam: budgeting the three hours across Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3, deciding an order to tackle the parts, leaving time to plan and proofread the essays, and avoiding the common timing failures.
How to budget three hours across the Regents ELA exam: a workable time plan for Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3, deciding an order to tackle the parts, leaving time to plan and proofread the essays, and avoiding the timing failures that cost otherwise strong students marks.
- Understanding the scoring rubrics: how the two holistic essay rubrics work (Part 2 out of 6, Part 3 out of 4), the four shared criteria they both use, what holistic scoring means, and how to use the band language to lift a response.
How the two Regents ELA essay rubrics work: the Part 2 6-point and Part 3 4-point holistic rubrics, the four shared criteria (Content and Analysis, Command of Evidence, Coherence/Organization/Style, Control of Conventions), what holistic scoring means, and how to use the band language to raise a response.
- Understanding the source-based argument: the Part 2 task (four texts on one issue, take a position, use at least three sources), how it differs from a personal-opinion essay, and what each line of the task directions requires.
What Part 2 of the Regents ELA exam asks: four texts on one issue, establish a precise claim, distinguish it from opposing claims, and use specific evidence from at least three of the texts. How the source-based argument differs from a personal-opinion essay, line by line through the task directions.
- Understanding the text-analysis task: the Part 3 task (one text, identify a central idea, analyze how one writing strategy develops it), why it is a two-move analytical task rather than a summary, and what each part of the directions requires.
What Part 3 of the Regents ELA exam asks: one text, identify a central idea, and analyze how one writing strategy develops it. Why it is a two-move analytical task rather than a summary, and what each part of the directions requires of a top-band response.
Sources & how we know this
- Regents Examinations in English Language Arts — NYSED (2025)
- Educator Guide to the Regents Examination in English Language Arts — NYSED (2025)