Skip to main content
United StatesReading and WritingSyllabus dot point

How do you compare two short paired texts and judge how one author would respond to the other?

Cross-text connections: reading a pair of short texts, summarising each author's position, and choosing how the author of one text would most likely respond to, agree with, or differ from a claim in the other.

A focused answer to the Digital SAT cross-text-connections skill: reading paired Text 1 and Text 2, writing a short position for each, and choosing how the author of one would respond to the other, while rejecting answers that capture only a single text.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this skill is asking
  2. Summarise each position first
  3. Map one text onto the other
  4. Both texts, not one

What this skill is asking

A cross-text connections question gives you a pair of short texts (Text 1 and Text 2) and asks how they relate: how the author of one would respond to the other, where they agree or disagree, or what relationship holds between them. On the Digital SAT, the College Board (Craft and Structure domain) phrases it as "Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the claim in Text 1 that...?" The skill is to grasp both positions precisely and choose the option that reflects them both.

Summarise each position first

You cannot compare two texts you have not pinned down. The reliable first move is to read each text and write a short, attitude-bearing summary before reading the question.

Pay special attention to concessions. When a text says "while X is true, Y," it is qualifying: it accepts X but adds a limit Y. A response that ignores either the concession or the limit will be wrong, because the author's real position includes both.

Map one text onto the other

The most common stem asks how the author of Text 2 would respond to a claim in Text 1. This is not a general comparison; it is targeted. Find the exact claim in Text 1 the question names, then read Text 2 specifically for how it treats that claim.

Both texts, not one

The defining discipline of this question type is that the answer must reflect both texts. A tempting wrong answer often summarises one text accurately while ignoring the other, or applies the wrong author's view. Before selecting, check that your choice is true to Text 1's claim and Text 2's actual stance. If it only fits one, it is wrong.

This skill draws on text structure and purpose (knowing each text's purpose) and central ideas (pinning each claim), then adds the comparison step. Because there are two short texts to hold in mind, the brief written position for each is what keeps the comparison accurate under time pressure.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Digital SAT R&W (style)1 marksText 1 argues that remote work boosts productivity because employees avoid commuting and office distractions. Text 2 concedes those benefits but argues that remote work weakens the informal collaboration that drives innovation. How would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to Text 1's claim? (A) By denying that commuting wastes time (B) By agreeing fully and adding no qualification (C) By accepting the productivity gains but noting they may come at the cost of innovation (D) By arguing that office distractions help productivity
Show worked answer →

The correct answer is (C).

Text 2 "concedes those benefits" (so it accepts the productivity gains) "but argues that remote work weakens... innovation" (so it adds a cost). A response that accepts the gains while noting a cost to innovation captures both parts of Text 2's position. Choice (A) contradicts the concession; (B) ignores Text 2's qualification; (D) misstates Text 2, which never praises distractions. The answer must reflect Text 2's actual, qualified stance.

Digital SAT R&W (style)1 marksText 1 claims a newly found manuscript is genuine, citing its ink and paper. Text 2 argues the manuscript is a forgery, noting anachronistic word choices the author could not have used. Which choice best describes the relationship between the two texts? (A) Text 2 supports Text 1 with extra evidence. (B) Text 2 disputes Text 1's conclusion using different evidence. (C) The two texts reach the same conclusion. (D) Text 2 restates Text 1's argument.
Show worked answer →

The correct answer is (B).

Text 1 says genuine (ink and paper); Text 2 says forgery (anachronistic words). They reach opposite conclusions, and Text 2 uses a different kind of evidence to dispute Text 1. Choice (A) is wrong because Text 2 opposes rather than supports; (C) is wrong because the conclusions differ; (D) is wrong because disputing is not restating. Summarise each position, then name the relationship.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this