Skip to main content
TexasBiologySyllabus dot point

What different lines of evidence show that species have changed over time and share common ancestors?

Analyze and evaluate the evidence for evolution, including the fossil record, homologous and vestigial structures, and molecular (DNA and protein) similarities (TEKS Biology, Reporting Category 3; patterns; cause and effect).

A TEKS-level answer on the evidence for evolution for the Texas STAAR Biology EOC: the fossil record, homologous and vestigial structures, and molecular similarities, and how each line points to common ancestry and change over time.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The fossil record
  3. Homologous and vestigial structures
  4. Molecular evidence
  5. Putting the evidence together
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

The Biology TEKS ask you to analyze and evaluate the evidence for evolution. For STAAR Reporting Category 3 you need to recognize the main lines of evidence (the fossil record, homologous and vestigial structures, and molecular similarities) and explain how each one points to common ancestry and change over time. This is a patterns and cause-and-effect topic, and it often appears as a question that gives you data or structures and asks what they suggest.

The fossil record

The fossil record shows that the kinds of organisms on Earth have changed over time: many species that once existed are now extinct, and forms found in older layers are often simpler or different from those in newer layers. Transitional fossils, which show features in between two groups, are especially strong evidence of gradual change. Because deeper layers are older, the order of fossils is a record of the sequence of life, a clear pattern over time.

Homologous and vestigial structures

Homologous structures are a powerful argument because there is no functional reason for unrelated species to share the same internal bone pattern; the simplest explanation is shared ancestry. Vestigial structures make the same point: a feature that no longer has its original use is best explained as a leftover from an ancestor where it did.

Molecular evidence

The most recent and precise evidence is molecular: comparing the DNA and protein sequences of different species. Because sequences are inherited and change slowly through mutation, species that share a more recent common ancestor have more similar sequences, while more distantly related species have accumulated more differences.

This is why molecular evidence so often agrees with the evidence from anatomy and fossils: all three reflect the same branching history of life. On STAAR, a table of sequence differences is a common stimulus, and the rule is simple: fewer differences means a closer relationship.

Putting the evidence together

No single fossil or structure proves evolution on its own. The strength of the case is that many independent lines of evidence agree: the fossil record, comparative anatomy, vestigial structures, and molecular data all point to the same conclusion, that today's species descended with modification from earlier ones. Evaluating evidence, weighing how well it supports a claim, is exactly the science practice this category tests.

Try this

Q1. Explain why homologous structures are evidence of a common ancestor. [2]

  • Cue. They share the same underlying structure despite different functions; the simplest explanation is that they were inherited from a shared ancestor.

Q2. A table shows species A and B differ in DNA by 3 bases, and species A and C differ by 25 bases. Which pair is more closely related? [1]

  • Cue. A and B, because fewer differences indicate a more recent common ancestor.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of TEA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

STAAR Biology (2023 released style)1 marksThe forelimbs of a human, a whale, and a bat have a similar arrangement of bones but are used for different functions. These limbs are best described as which type of evidence for evolution? (A) Vestigial structures. (B) Homologous structures. (C) Fossils. (D) Mutations.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point multiple-choice item on homologous structures.

The correct answer is B. Structures with a similar underlying arrangement but different functions are homologous structures, and they suggest a common ancestor. A vestigial structure (A) is a reduced, function-poor remnant, C is a different line of evidence, and D is the source of variation, not a structure.

Same basic structure, different use, points to common ancestry: that is homologous.

STAAR Biology (2024 SCR style)2 marksTwo species share a very similar DNA sequence for the same gene, while a third species has a very different sequence for that gene. Explain what this molecular evidence suggests about how closely related the species are. Support your answer with reasoning.
Show worked answer →

A 2-point short constructed response on molecular evidence.

Full credit (2 points): the two species with very similar DNA sequences are likely more closely related (shared a common ancestor more recently), because closely related species inherit similar sequences; the third species with a very different sequence is more distantly related, since more differences accumulate over more time since the common ancestor.

Partial credit (1 point): links similar DNA to closer relationship without explaining why differences accumulate over time. The science is scored.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this