Skip to main content
United StatesChemistrySyllabus dot point

How do we find the rate law when the slow step of a mechanism follows a fast equilibrium and contains an intermediate?

Topic 5.9 Pre-Equilibrium Approximation: derive the rate law of a mechanism with a fast initial equilibrium followed by a slow step by expressing the intermediate concentration in terms of reactant concentrations.

A focused answer to AP Chemistry Topic 5.9, covering the steady-state and pre-equilibrium approximation, mechanisms with a fast initial equilibrium and a slow second step, and how to eliminate an intermediate to derive the overall rate law, with full worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The problem: an intermediate in the rate law
  3. Using the fast equilibrium
  4. Building the overall rate law
  5. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 5.9) wants you to derive the rate law for a mechanism in which a fast initial equilibrium precedes a slow step, by expressing the intermediate concentration in terms of reactant concentrations. This handles the case left open in Topic 5.8: when the slow step's rate law contains an intermediate, you must eliminate it before the rate law is acceptable.

The problem: an intermediate in the rate law

The rate-determining step gives the rate law (Topic 5.8), but if that step's reactants include an intermediate, the expression is not yet usable. The fix is to relate the intermediate back to the actual reactants using the fast step that made it.

Using the fast equilibrium

The reasoning is that a fast reversible step reaches equilibrium quickly compared with the slow step that drains the intermediate, so to a good approximation the forward and reverse rates of the fast step balance. This lets you write the intermediate's concentration as a ratio of rate constants times powers of the reactant concentrations.

Building the overall rate law

After substitution, the individual rate constants merge into a single composite constant k=k1k2kβˆ’1k = \dfrac{k_1 k_2}{k_{-1}} (for the common two-step case), and the orders come out of the powers of the reactant concentrations. The resulting overall order can be unusual, for example third order, which the overall stoichiometry alone would never reveal. Matching this derived rate law to the experimental one is the confirmation that the mechanism is viable.

Try this

Q1. For a fast equilibrium 2Xβ‡ŒY2\text{X} \rightleftharpoons \text{Y}, write [Y][\text{Y}] in terms of [X][\text{X}] and the forward and reverse rate constants. [2 points]

  • Cue. k1[X]2=kβˆ’1[Y]k_1[\text{X}]^2 = k_{-1}[\text{Y}], so [Y]=k1kβˆ’1[X]2[\text{Y}] = \dfrac{k_1}{k_{-1}}[\text{X}]^2.

Q2. Explain why an intermediate cannot remain in the final rate law. [1 point]

  • Cue. The rate law must be expressed in terms of measurable reactant concentrations; an intermediate is a transient species, not a starting material.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2022 (style)4 marksSection II (long FRQ, part). For 2NO+O2β†’2NO22\text{NO} + \text{O}_2 \rightarrow 2\text{NO}_2, a proposed mechanism is Step 1 (fast equilibrium): 2NOβ‡ŒN2O22\text{NO} \rightleftharpoons \text{N}_2\text{O}_2; Step 2 (slow): N2O2+O2β†’2NO2\text{N}_2\text{O}_2 + \text{O}_2 \rightarrow 2\text{NO}_2. (a) Write the rate law in terms of the intermediate from the slow step. (b) Use the fast equilibrium to express [N2O2][\text{N}_2\text{O}_2] in terms of [NO][\text{NO}]. (c) Derive the overall rate law in terms of reactants only. (d) State the overall order.
Show worked answer β†’

A 4-point quantitative FRQ on the pre-equilibrium approximation.

(a) Rate law from slow step (1 point): rate=k2[N2O2][O2]\text{rate} = k_2[\text{N}_2\text{O}_2][\text{O}_2].
(b) Express the intermediate (1 point): for the fast equilibrium, forward rate equals reverse rate: k1[NO]2=kβˆ’1[N2O2]k_1[\text{NO}]^2 = k_{-1}[\text{N}_2\text{O}_2], so [N2O2]=k1kβˆ’1[NO]2[\text{N}_2\text{O}_2] = \dfrac{k_1}{k_{-1}}[\text{NO}]^2.
(c) Overall rate law (1 point): substituting, rate=k2β‹…k1kβˆ’1[NO]2[O2]=k[NO]2[O2]\text{rate} = k_2 \cdot \dfrac{k_1}{k_{-1}}[\text{NO}]^2[\text{O}_2] = k[\text{NO}]^2[\text{O}_2], where k=k1k2kβˆ’1k = \dfrac{k_1 k_2}{k_{-1}}.
(d) Overall order (1 point): 2+1=32 + 1 = 3, so the reaction is third order overall.

Markers reward the slow-step rate law, the equilibrium expression for the intermediate, the substituted overall rate law in reactants only, and the overall order.

AP 2021 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). In a mechanism with a fast first equilibrium and a slow second step, an intermediate appears in the slow-step rate law. To obtain the overall rate law you should (A) leave the intermediate in the rate law (B) replace the intermediate using the fast equilibrium (C) ignore the slow step (D) use the overall stoichiometry. Justify your choice.
Show worked answer β†’

A 1-point conceptual MCQ. The answer is (B).

A rate law must be written in terms of measurable reactant concentrations, not intermediates. The fast equilibrium relates the intermediate to the reactants by setting forward and reverse rates equal, so you substitute that expression in. The trap is (A): intermediates cannot remain in a final rate law.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this