Skip to main content
United StatesChemistrySyllabus dot point

How does the rate-determining step of a mechanism set the rate law of the overall reaction?

Topic 5.8 Reaction Mechanism and Rate Law: identify the rate-determining (slow) step of a mechanism and use it to write the rate law, and check a proposed mechanism against the experimental rate law.

A focused answer to AP Chemistry Topic 5.8, covering the rate-determining step, writing the rate law from the slow step, the slow-step-first case, and how a proposed mechanism must agree with the experimental rate law, with full worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The rate-determining step
  3. Writing the rate law from the slow step
  4. When the slow step is not first
  5. Checking a mechanism against data
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 5.8) wants you to identify the rate-determining (slow) step of a mechanism and use it to write the rate law, then check whether a proposed mechanism is consistent with the experimental rate law. This is where mechanism and rate law meet: the slow step is the bottleneck that controls how fast the whole reaction goes.

The rate-determining step

Think of a multi-step process as a chain of tasks: the slowest task limits the throughput of the whole chain. Speeding up a fast step does nothing; only the slow step matters for the rate. This is why the overall rate law often involves only some of the reactants.

Writing the rate law from the slow step

The simplest and most common AP case is a slow first step: the rate law is just kk times the concentrations of the slow step's reactants, each raised to its coefficient. A species that reacts only later, in a fast step, is consumed after the bottleneck and so has no effect on the overall rate.

When the slow step is not first

If the slow step comes after a fast initial equilibrium, its rate law may contain an intermediate, which cannot appear in the final rate law because intermediates are not measurable starting materials. You handle this by using the fast equilibrium before the slow step: set the forward and reverse rates equal and solve for the intermediate concentration in terms of reactant concentrations, then substitute. This can produce a rate law with unusual orders, which is exactly why such orders signal a multi-step mechanism.

Checking a mechanism against data

A proposed mechanism must pass two tests: the steps must sum to the overall equation (Topic 5.7), and the rate law predicted by the slow step must match the experimental rate law. A mechanism that fails either test is rejected. Passing both does not prove the mechanism is correct, but it makes it a viable proposal, which is all chemistry can claim.

Try this

Q1. A mechanism has a slow first step A+B→C\text{A} + \text{B} \rightarrow \text{C} (elementary). Write the overall rate law. [2 points]

  • Cue. rate=k[A][B]\text{rate} = k[\text{A}][\text{B}], straight from the slow elementary step.

Q2. Explain why a reactant that appears only in a fast step after the slow step does not appear in the rate law. [2 points]

  • Cue. The rate-determining step sets the rate; species consumed after it have already passed the bottleneck and cannot speed the reaction, so they do not enter the rate law.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2023 (style)4 marksSection II (long FRQ, part). A reaction has the experimental rate law rate=k[NO2]2\text{rate} = k[\text{NO}_2]^2 and overall equation NO2+CO→NO+CO2\text{NO}_2 + \text{CO} \rightarrow \text{NO} + \text{CO}_2. A proposed mechanism is Step 1 (slow): 2NO2→NO3+NO2\text{NO}_2 \rightarrow \text{NO}_3 + \text{NO}; Step 2 (fast): NO3+CO→NO2+CO2\text{NO}_3 + \text{CO} \rightarrow \text{NO}_2 + \text{CO}_2. (a) Write the rate law predicted by the slow step. (b) Determine whether the mechanism is consistent with the experimental rate law. (c) Explain why CO does not appear in the rate law. (d) Identify the intermediate.
Show worked answer β†’

A 4-point conceptual FRQ on the rate-determining step.

(a) Predicted rate law (1 point): the slow step is elementary and bimolecular in NO2\text{NO}_2, so rate=k[NO2]2\text{rate} = k[\text{NO}_2]^2.
(b) Consistency (1 point): the predicted rate=k[NO2]2\text{rate} = k[\text{NO}_2]^2 matches the experimental rate law exactly, so the mechanism is consistent with the data.
(c) CO absent (1 point): CO reacts only in the fast step, after the rate-determining step, so it does not affect the overall rate and does not appear in the rate law.
(d) Intermediate (1 point): NO3\text{NO}_3 is the intermediate, produced in step 1 and consumed in step 2.

Markers reward the rate law from the slow step, the consistency conclusion, the reasoning that post-slow-step species are absent, and identifying the intermediate.

AP 2021 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). The rate law of an overall reaction is determined mainly by (A) the fastest elementary step (B) the slowest (rate-determining) elementary step (C) the overall stoichiometry (D) the most exothermic step. Justify your choice.
Show worked answer β†’

A 1-point conceptual MCQ. The answer is (B).

The slowest step is the bottleneck: the overall reaction can proceed no faster than its slowest elementary step, so that step (the rate-determining step) sets the rate law. The trap is (C): overall stoichiometry does not give the rate law unless the reaction is elementary.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this