Skip to main content
United StatesChemistrySyllabus dot point

How do we calculate the value of an equilibrium constant from equilibrium concentrations or from initial data using an ICE table?

Topic 7.4 Calculating the Equilibrium Constant: calculate the value of an equilibrium constant from equilibrium concentrations or pressures, using an ICE table where initial and equilibrium data are mixed.

A focused answer to AP Chemistry Topic 7.4, covering calculating Kc or Kp from equilibrium values, the ICE table method, and converting between initial and equilibrium concentrations, with full worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Direct calculation from equilibrium values
  3. The ICE table
  4. Using the stoichiometry
  5. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 7.4) wants you to calculate the value of an equilibrium constant from equilibrium concentrations or pressures, using an ICE table when you are given initial amounts and one equilibrium value. This is the workhorse calculation of the unit: turning measured data into a value of KK.

Direct calculation from equilibrium values

This is the simplest case: read off the equilibrium concentrations, plug them in, and compute. The arithmetic is straightforward; the only care needed is raising each concentration to its correct coefficient and keeping products over reactants.

The ICE table

The ICE table is needed when only the initial amounts and one equilibrium value are given. Because the changes all relate through the coefficients, one unknown xx describes the whole reaction. Solving for xx from the known equilibrium value fills in every entry, and the equilibrium row then goes into the KK expression.

Using the stoichiometry

The coefficients control the change row. For A+2B3C\text{A} + 2\text{B} \rightleftharpoons 3\text{C}, if A changes by x-x then B changes by 2x-2x and C by +3x+3x. This proportionality is just conservation of atoms expressed in the change row. Getting the multiples and signs right is the most error-prone step, so always read them straight from the balanced equation.

It is worth being deliberate about which species you let define xx. If you are given the equilibrium concentration of one product, set the change in that species equal to its coefficient times xx and solve for xx first; every other change then follows from the coefficients. If instead you are given how much of a reactant was consumed, that consumption is the change for the reactant, and you scale it by the coefficient ratios to get the others. The single unknown xx ties the whole table together, which is the great economy of the ICE method: no matter how many species are involved, one number describes the entire reaction's progress, and conservation of mass guarantees the changes stay in the ratio of the coefficients.

Try this

Q1. For AB\text{A} \rightleftharpoons \text{B}, a flask starts with [A]=0.50[\text{A}] = 0.50 M; at equilibrium [B]=0.20[\text{B}] = 0.20 M. Calculate KcK_c. [3 points]

  • Cue. [A]eq=0.500.20=0.30[\text{A}]_\text{eq} = 0.50 - 0.20 = 0.30 M; Kc=0.200.30=0.67K_c = \dfrac{0.20}{0.30} = 0.67.

Q2. In an ICE table for 2AB2\text{A} \rightleftharpoons \text{B}, write the change in [A][\text{A}] if [B][\text{B}] changes by +x+x. [1 point]

  • Cue. 2x-2x (two A consumed per B formed).

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2023 (style)4 marksSection II (long FRQ, part). For H2(g)+I2(g)2HI(g)\text{H}_2(g) + \text{I}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2\text{HI}(g), a flask initially holds [H2]=0.100[\text{H}_2] = 0.100 and [I2]=0.100[\text{I}_2] = 0.100 M and no HI. At equilibrium [HI]=0.160[\text{HI}] = 0.160 M. (a) Construct an ICE table for the reaction. (b) Determine the equilibrium concentrations of H2\text{H}_2 and I2\text{I}_2. (c) Calculate KcK_c. (d) Justify why the change in [H2][\text{H}_2] is half the change in [HI][\text{HI}].
Show worked answer →

A 4-point quantitative FRQ using an ICE table.

(a) ICE table (1 point): Initial: H2 0.100\text{H}_2\ 0.100, I2 0.100\text{I}_2\ 0.100, HI 0\text{HI}\ 0. Change: H2 x\text{H}_2\ -x, I2 x\text{I}_2\ -x, HI +2x\text{HI}\ +2x. Equilibrium: H2 0.100x\text{H}_2\ 0.100 - x, I2 0.100x\text{I}_2\ 0.100 - x, HI 2x\text{HI}\ 2x. Since 2x=0.1602x = 0.160, x=0.080x = 0.080.
(b) Equilibrium reactants (1 point): [H2]=[I2]=0.1000.080=0.020[\text{H}_2] = [\text{I}_2] = 0.100 - 0.080 = 0.020 M.
(c) KcK_c (1 point): Kc=(0.160)2(0.020)(0.020)=0.02560.0004=64K_c = \dfrac{(0.160)^2}{(0.020)(0.020)} = \dfrac{0.0256}{0.0004} = 64.
(d) Justify (1 point): the stoichiometry makes two HI for every one H2\text{H}_2 consumed, so the change in [H2][\text{H}_2] (xx) is half the change in [HI][\text{HI}] (2x2x).

Markers reward the ICE table with x=0.080x = 0.080, the equilibrium reactant concentrations, the value of KcK_c, and the stoichiometric reasoning.

AP 2021 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). In an ICE table for A2B\text{A} \rightleftharpoons 2\text{B}, if [A][\text{A}] changes by x-x, then [B][\text{B}] changes by (A) x-x (B) +x+x (C) +2x+2x (D) 2x-2x. Justify your choice.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point conceptual MCQ. The answer is (C).

The coefficients set the relative changes: two B form for every one A consumed, so if A changes by x-x, B changes by +2x+2x. The trap is ignoring the coefficient of 2 on B.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this