Skip to main content
United StatesEnvironmental ScienceSyllabus dot point

How did the world manage to start healing the ozone layer?

Topic 9.2 Reducing Ozone Depletion: describe the strategies and international agreements used to reduce ozone depletion and how the ozone layer is recovering.

A focused answer to APES Topic 9.2, covering the Montreal Protocol, the phase-out of CFCs, substitutes (HCFCs and HFCs) and their trade-offs, why ozone recovery is slow, the success of international cooperation, and the lesson for other global problems, with a worked recovery-timescale reasoning example.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The Montreal Protocol and the phase-out
  3. Substitutes and their trade-offs
  4. Why recovery is slow
  5. Why this matters
  6. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 9.2) wants you to describe the strategies and international agreements used to reduce ozone depletion and how the ozone layer is recovering.

The Montreal Protocol and the phase-out

Substitutes and their trade-offs

Why recovery is slow

Why this matters

Topic 9.2 is the success story that completes Topic 9.1, and the AP exam contrasts it with the harder problem of climate change: ozone depletion had a clear cause, available substitutes and global agreement, so action worked. It links to greenhouse gases (HFC trade-off) and is the model for the international cooperation needed for global change.

Try this

Q1. Identify the international agreement that phased out ozone-depleting substances. [1 point]

  • Cue. The Montreal Protocol.

Q2. Explain why the ozone layer recovers slowly even after CFCs are banned. [2 points]

  • Cue. The CFCs already released are very persistent and remain in the atmosphere for decades, so the chlorine they release keeps destroying ozone long after production and emissions have stopped.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2022 (style)4 marksSection II (FRQ). (a) Identify the international agreement that phased out ozone-depleting substances. (b) Explain how it reduces ozone depletion. (c) Explain why the ozone layer recovers slowly even after CFCs are banned. (d) Identify one trade-off of a CFC substitute.
Show worked answer →

A 4-point FRQ on reducing ozone depletion.

(a) Identify (1 point): the Montreal Protocol.
(b) Explain (1 point): it phases out the production and use of CFCs and other ozone-depleting substances, so less chlorine reaches the stratosphere over time.
(c) Explain (1 point): CFCs already released are very persistent and remain in the atmosphere for decades, so chlorine keeps destroying ozone long after emissions stop.
(d) Identify (1 point): HCFCs still deplete some ozone (a transitional substitute), and HFCs do not deplete ozone but are potent greenhouse gases.

Markers reward the Montreal Protocol, the phase-out mechanism, the persistence of existing CFCs for slow recovery, and a valid substitute trade-off.

AP 2018 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). The Montreal Protocol is widely regarded as a success because it: (A) reduced carbon dioxide emissions worldwide (B) phased out ozone-depleting substances through international cooperation (C) banned all fossil fuels (D) eliminated acid rain. Justify your choice.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point MCQ on the Montreal Protocol. The answer is (B).

The Montreal Protocol is celebrated for phasing out CFCs and other ozone-depleting substances through near-universal international cooperation, putting the ozone layer on a path to recovery. It did not target carbon dioxide (A), ban all fossil fuels (C), or address acid rain (D). The trap is confusing the Montreal Protocol (ozone) with climate agreements (carbon dioxide); they tackle different problems.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this