Skip to main content
United StatesPhysics C: MechanicsSyllabus dot point

When is angular momentum conserved, and how do we use its conservation to analyze a spinning system whose rotational inertia changes or that is struck by a moving object?

Topic 6.4 Conservation of Angular Momentum: state that angular momentum is conserved when the net external torque is zero, and apply it to changing rotational inertia and rotational collisions.

A focused answer to AP Physics C: Mechanics Topic 6.4, covering the condition for angular momentum conservation (zero net external torque), the spinning-skater effect of changing rotational inertia, rotational collisions where a particle strikes a pivoted body, and why kinetic energy need not be conserved, with worked examples.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. The condition for conservation
  3. Changing rotational inertia: the skater effect
  4. Rotational collisions
  5. Try this

What this topic is asking

The College Board (Topic 6.4) wants you to state that angular momentum is conserved when the net external torque is zero, and to apply this to systems with changing rotational inertia (the spinning skater) and to rotational collisions (a particle striking a pivoted body). It is the rotational analogue of linear momentum conservation and one of the most elegant tools in mechanics.

The condition for conservation

The justification is τext=dLdt\vec{\tau}_{ext} = \dfrac{d\vec{L}}{dt} from the previous topic: if the net external torque is zero, the total angular momentum does not change. Internal torques come in equal-and-opposite pairs (Newton's third law for rotation) and cancel when summed over the system, so they cannot alter the total. This mirrors linear momentum conservation exactly, with torque in place of force and angular momentum in place of linear momentum.

Changing rotational inertia: the skater effect

The most vivid consequence appears when a body's rotational inertia changes while no external torque acts. Then IωI\omega is constant, so

Iiωi=Ifωf.I_i\omega_i = I_f\omega_f.

A figure skater spinning with arms out has a large II and slow ω\omega; pulling her arms in decreases II, so ω\omega increases to keep LL fixed, and she spins faster. The same principle speeds up a collapsing star and lets a diver control rotation by tucking. Note that the rotational kinetic energy 12Iω2=12Lω\tfrac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}L\omega rises when ω\omega rises, the extra energy comes from the work the skater does pulling her arms inward against the outward pull, so energy is not conserved even though angular momentum is.

Rotational collisions

When a moving object strikes a pivoted body and the two then rotate together, angular momentum about the pivot is conserved (the impact forces are internal, and the pivot exerts no torque about itself). Treat the incoming object as a particle with angular momentum L=mvrL = mvr_\perp about the pivot, and set the total before equal to the total after:

mvr=(Ibody+Iobject)ωf.mvr_\perp = (I_{body} + I_{object})\omega_f.

This is the rotational analogue of a perfectly inelastic collision, and like that case, kinetic energy is lost to the impact. The method, particle angular momentum in, combined rotational inertia out, handles a bullet embedding in a rod, a child jumping on a merry-go-round, or a ball of clay striking a turntable.

Try this

Q1. A turntable with I=0.40I = 0.40 kg m squared spins at 6.06.0 rad/s. A lump of clay is dropped on, raising the inertia to 0.600.60 kg m squared. Calculate the new angular velocity. [2 points]

  • Cue. Iiωi=Ifωfωf=(0.40)(6.0)/0.60=4.0I_i\omega_i = I_f\omega_f \Rightarrow \omega_f = (0.40)(6.0)/0.60 = 4.0 rad/s.

Q2. Explain why a skater spins faster when she pulls her arms in, in terms of conserved quantities. [2 points]

  • Cue. No external torque, so L=IωL = I\omega is conserved; reducing II increases ω\omega.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of College Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AP 2024 (style)6 marksSection II (FRQ). A child of mass 4040 kg runs at 3.03.0 m/s tangentially and jumps onto the rim of a stationary playground merry-go-round (a uniform disk, I=12MR2I = \tfrac{1}{2}MR^2) of mass 120120 kg and radius 2.02.0 m. (a) Determine the angular momentum of the child about the axis just before jumping on. (b) Using conservation of angular momentum, determine the final angular velocity of the system. (c) State whether kinetic energy is conserved, with justification.
Show worked answer →

A 6-point rotational-collision FRQ.

(a) Child's angular momentum (2 points): treat the child as a particle at the rim, L=mvr=(40)(3.0)(2.0)=240L = mvr = (40)(3.0)(2.0) = 240 kg m squared per s.
(b) Final angular velocity (3 points): the disk's rotational inertia is Idisk=12(120)(2.0)2=240I_{disk} = \tfrac{1}{2}(120)(2.0)^2 = 240 kg m squared; the child on the rim adds Ichild=mr2=(40)(2.0)2=160I_{child} = mr^2 = (40)(2.0)^2 = 160 kg m squared. Conserve angular momentum: 240=(240+160)ω=400ω240 = (240 + 160)\omega = 400\omega, so ω=0.60\omega = 0.60 rad/s.
(c) Kinetic energy (1 point): not conserved; this is a perfectly inelastic rotational collision, so some kinetic energy is lost to the impact. (Ki=12(40)(3.0)2=180K_i = \tfrac{1}{2}(40)(3.0)^2 = 180 J; Kf=12(400)(0.60)2=72K_f = \tfrac{1}{2}(400)(0.60)^2 = 72 J.)

Markers reward treating the running child as a particle with L=mvrL = mvr and adding rotational inertias for the combined system.

AP 2021 (style)1 marksSection I (multiple choice). A spinning ice skater pulls her arms in, decreasing her rotational inertia. As she does so, her angular velocity... (A) decreases (B) stays the same (C) increases (D) drops to zero. Justify your reasoning.
Show worked answer →

A 1-point conceptual MCQ. The answer is (C).

With no external torque, her angular momentum L=IωL = I\omega is conserved. Pulling her arms in decreases II, so ω\omega must increase to keep LL constant. (Her rotational kinetic energy 12Iω2=12Lω\tfrac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}L\omega actually increases, supplied by the work she does pulling her arms in.) The trap (A) confuses conservation of angular momentum with conservation of angular velocity.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this